Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:22:50.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Perspectives on Reductionism in Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Alan C. Love
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 523 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Marie Kaiser for comments on an earlier draft of this review.

References

Brigandt, Ingo, and Love, Alan C. 2017. “Reductionism in Biology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reduction-biology/.Google Scholar
Brooks, Daniel S. 2017. “In Defense of Levels: Layer Cakes and Guilt by Association.” Biological Theory 12:142–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Thomas. 2014. “Philosophy and the Professional Image of Philosophy.” PhD diss., Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/167067.Google Scholar
Frantz, Christian, Stewart, Kathleen M., and Weaver, Valerie M. 2010. “The Extracellular Matrix at a Glance.” Journal of Cell Science 123:4195–4200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, Emily J., Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, and Taylor, Jordan C. V. 2016. “The Seductive Allure Is a Reductive Allure: People Prefer Scientific Explanations That Contain Logically Irrelevant Reductive Information.” Cognition 155:67–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüttemann, Andreas, and Love, Alan C. 2011. “Aspects of Reductive Explanation in Biological Science: Intrinsicality, Fundamentality, and Temporality.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 62:519–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttemann, Andreas, and Love, Alan C. 2016. “Reduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, ed. Humphries, Paul, 460–84. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschner, Marc W. 2005. “The Meaning of Systems Biology.” Cell 121:503–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, Alan C. 2008. “From Philosophy to Science (to Natural Philosophy): Evolutionary Developmental Perspectives.” Quarterly Review of Biology 83:65–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 2006. Darwinian Reductionism; or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra 2015. “Nagel on Reduction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 53:43–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheredos, Benjamin, Burnston, Daniel, Abrahamsen, Adele, and Bechtel, William. 2013. “Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?” Philosophy of Science 80:931–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1965. The Blue and the Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the Philosophical Investigations. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar