Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:11:10.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Look at Relational Holism in Quantum Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Matteo Morganti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Teller argued that violations of Bell's inequalities are to be explained by interpreting quantum entangled systems according to ‘relational holism’, that is, by postulating that they exhibit irreducible (‘inherent’) relations. Teller also suggested a possible application of this idea to quantum statistics. However, the basic proposal was not explained in detail nor has the additional idea about statistics been articulated in further work. In this article, I reconsider relational holism, amending it and spelling it out as appears necessary for a proper assessment, and application, of the position.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 5 , December 2009 , pp. 1027 - 1038
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackburn, S. (1990), “Filling in Space”, Filling in Space 50:62–63.Google Scholar
Cabello, A. (1999a), “Quantum Correlations Are Not Contained in the Initial State”, Quantum Correlations Are Not Contained in the Initial State 60:877–880.Google Scholar
Cabello, A.. (1999b), “Quantum Correlations Are Not Local Elements of Reality”, Quantum Correlations Are Not Local Elements of Reality 59:113–115.Google Scholar
Chang, H., and Cartwright, N. (1993), “Causality and Realism in the EPR Experiment”, Causality and Realism in the EPR Experiment 38:169–190.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (1989), “Do Correlations Need to Be Explained?”, in Cushing, J. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 175–194.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1983), Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and the Philosophy of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gisin, N. (2008), “Can Relativity Be Considered Complete? From Newtonian Nonlocality to Quantum Nonlocality and Beyond”, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0512168v2.Google Scholar
Holton, R. (1999), “Dispositions All the Way Down”, Dispositions All the Way Down 59:9–14.Google Scholar
Howard, D. (1989), “Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments”, in Cushing, J. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 224–253.Google Scholar
Jarrett, J. P. (1984), “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments”, On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments 18:569–589.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (1991), Locality and Holism: The Metaphysics of Quantum Theory. PhD Dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Jones, M., and Clifton, R. (1993), “Against Experimental Metaphysics”, in French, P., Uehling, J. T. E., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 18. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 295–316.Google Scholar
Jordan, T. F. (1999), “Quantum Correlations Violate Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Assumptions”, Quantum Correlations Violate Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Assumptions 60:2726–2728.Google Scholar
Lange, M. (2002), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics: Locality, Fields, Energy and Mass. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maudlin, T. (1994), Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McKitrick, J. (2003), “The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions”, The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions 66:349–369.Google Scholar
Mermin, N. D. (1999), “What Do These Correlations Know about Reality? Nonlocality and the Absurd”, What Do These Correlations Know about Reality? Nonlocality and the Absurd 29:571–587.Google Scholar
Muller, F., and Saunders, S. (2008), “Discerning Fermions”, Discerning Fermions 59:499–548.Google Scholar
Seevinck, M. (2006), “The Quantum World Is Not Built Up from Correlations”, The Quantum World Is Not Built Up from Correlations 36:1573–1586.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2008), “The Identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional”, The Identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional 68:271–282.Google Scholar
Teller, P. (1986), “Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics”, Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics 37:71–81.Google Scholar
Teller, P.. (1989), “Relativity, Relational Holism, and the Bell Inequalities”, in Cushing, J. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 208–223.Google Scholar
Winsberg, E., and Fine, A. (2003), “Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation”, Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation 100:80–97.Google Scholar