Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:13:46.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neutral Functional Statement Schemata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Lowell Nissen
Lowell Nissen*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The claim that there are nonpurposive functional statements is critically examined by looking at nine translation schemata, several of which are drawn from recent literature. All but one or two fail, suggesting that all functional statements (a) are causal (and not about probabilities or necessary conditions), and (b) have implicit reference to goals. If so, then the possibility of nonpurposive functional statements rests squarely on the possibility of nonpurposive goals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 251 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Canfield, J., “Teleological Explanation in Biology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14, 1964, pp. 285–295.10.1093/bjps/XIV.56.285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Canfield, J., “Teleological Explanation in Biology: A Reply,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, 1965, pp. 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Gruner, R., “Teleological and Functional Explanations,” Mind, vol. 75, pp. 516–526.Google Scholar
[4] Hempel, C., “The Logic of Functional Analysis,” Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[5] Lehman, H., “Teleological Explanation in Biology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, 1965, p. 327.10.1093/bjps/XV.60.327-aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Nagel, E., The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York and Burlingame, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Nissen, L., “Canfield's Functional Translation Schema,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, May, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Scheffler, I., The Anatomy of Inquiry, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1963.Google Scholar