No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2022
The purpose of this paper may be found in the following quotation. “Whenever an argument can be made to lead to a descending infinitude of natural numbers the hypothesis upon which the argument rests becomes untenable. This method of proof is called the method of infinite descent; .... It would be interesting and valuable to compare this method with the method of mathematical induction.”
1 Dresden, Arnold, An Invitation to Mathematics (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1936), p. 171.
2 For entire proof see: Reid, Leigh W., Theory of Algebraic Numbers (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1910), pp. 19–20.
3 Smart, Harold R., The Logic of Science (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1931), p. 103.
4 All historical information given from this point on is taken from Bulletin of the National Research Council, #63, National Academy of Sciences (Washington, D. C., 1928).