Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:23:34.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meiland on Scheffler, Kuhn, and Objectivity in Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Harvey Siegel
Harvey Siegel*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1976 , pp. 441 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I should like to thank Israel Scheffler for fruitful discussion of these and related topics, and for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962; 2nd ed., enlarged, 1970. (All page references to the second edition.)Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. “Postscript” to [1], included in the second edition: 174–210.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” and “Reflections on My Critics”, Both in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Edited by Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970: 1–23 and 231–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiland, J. W. “Kuhn, Scheffler, and Objectivity in Science.” Philosophy of Science, 41, 2 (1974): 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, I. Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967.Google Scholar
Scheffler, I. “Vision and Revolution: A Postscript on Kuhn.” Philosophy of Science, 39, (1972): 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. “The Paradigm Concept.” Science, 172, (1971): 706–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar