Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:10:20.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Massive Modularity and Brain Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Edouard Machery
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quartz (2002) argues that some recent findings about the evolution of the brain (Finlay and Darlington 1995) are inconsistent with evolutionary psychologists’ massive modularity hypothesis. In substance, Quartz contends that since the volume of the neocortex evolved in a concerted manner, natural selection did not act on neocortical systems independently of one another, which is a necessary condition for cognition to be massively modular. In this article, I argue that Quartz's argument fails to undermine the massive modularity hypothesis.

Type
Evolutionary Models and Evolutionary Psychology
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2007 , pp. 825 - 838
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Carl Craver for his reply to a talk based on this article at the annual meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology (June 2006). Previous versions were presented at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) in April 2006, at the annual meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology in June 2006 and at the meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association in November 2006.

References

Aiello, Leslie C., and Wheeler, Peter (1995), “The Expensive Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution”, The Expensive Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution 36:199–221.Google Scholar
Barrett, Clark H., and Kurzban, Robert (2006), “Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate”, Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate 113:628–647.Google ScholarPubMed
Barton, Robert A., and Harvey, Paul H. (2000), “Mosaic Evolution of Brain Structure in Mammals”, Mosaic Evolution of Brain Structure in Mammals 405:1055–1058.Google ScholarPubMed
Buller, David J. (2005), Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda (1989), “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task”, The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task 31:187–278.Google ScholarPubMed
De Winter, Willem, and Oxnard, Charles E. (2001), “Evolutionary Radiations and Convergence in the Structural Organization of Mammalian Brains”, Evolutionary Radiations and Convergence in the Structural Organization of Mammalian Brains 409:710–714.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., Bates, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico, and Plunkett, Kim (1996), Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Finlay, Barbara L., and Darlington, Richard B. (1995), “Linked Regularities in the Development and Evolution of Mammalian Brains”, Linked Regularities in the Development and Evolution of Mammalian Brains 268:1578–1584.Google ScholarPubMed
Finlay, Barbara L., Darlington, Richard B., and Nicastro, Nicholas (2001), “Developmental Structure in Brain Evolution”, Developmental Structure in Brain Evolution 24:263–307.Google ScholarPubMed
Fishman, Mark C., and Olson, Eric N. (1997), “Parsing the Heart: Genetic Modules for Organ Assembly”, Parsing the Heart: Genetic Modules for Organ Assembly 91:153–156.Google ScholarPubMed
Fodor, Jerry A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Julian S., and Teissier, Georges (1936), “Terminology of Relative Growth”, Terminology of Relative Growth 137:780–781.Google Scholar
Krebs, John R., Sherry, David F., Healy, Susan D., Perry, V. Hugh, and Vaccarino, Anthony L. (1989), “Hippocampal Specialization in Food-Storing Birds”, Hippocampal Specialization in Food-Storing Birds 86:1388–1392.Google ScholarPubMed
Machery, Edouard, and Barrett, Clark H. (2006). “Debunking Adapting Minds”, Philosophy of Science 73:232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuss, Todd M. (2004), “Specializations of the Human Visual System: The Monkey Model Meets Human Reality”, in Kaas, Jon H. and Collins, Christine E. (eds.), The Primate Visual System. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 231–259.Google Scholar
Quartz, Steve R. (1999), “The Constructivist Brain”, The Constructivist Brain 3:48–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Quartz, Steve R. (2002), “Toward a Developmental Evolutionary Psychology: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of the Human Cognitive Architecture”, in Scher, Steven J. and Rauscher, Frederick (eds.), Evolutionary Psychology: Alternative Approaches. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–210.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard (1998), “What Brains Won’t Tell Us about the Mind: A Critique of the Neurobiological Argument against Representational Nativism”, What Brains Won’t Tell Us about the Mind: A Critique of the Neurobiological Argument against Representational Nativism 13:548–570.Google Scholar
Stephan, Heinz, Frahm, Heiko, and Baron, Georg (1981), “New and Revised Data on Volumes of Brain Structures in Insectivores and Primates”, New and Revised Data on Volumes of Brain Structures in Insectivores and Primates 35:1–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, Valerie E., Cosmides, Leda, Tooby, John, Kroll, Neal, and Knight, Robert T. (2002), “Selective Impairment of Reasoning about Social Exchange in a Patient with Bilateral Limbic System Damage”, Selective Impairment of Reasoning about Social Exchange in a Patient with Bilateral Limbic System Damage 99:11531–11536.Google Scholar
Striedter, Georg F. (2005), Principles of Brain Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda (1992), “The Psychological Foundations of Culture”, in Barkow, John, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 19–136.Google Scholar