Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:42:53.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Populations: Bounding Genes in Space and in Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Lisa Gannett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At least below the level of species, biological populations are not mind-independent objects that scientists discover. Rather, biological populations are pragmatically constructed as objects of investigation according to the aims, interests, and values that inform particular research contexts. The relations among organisms that are constitutive of population-level phenomena (e.g., mating propensity, genealogy, and competition) occur as matters of degree and so give rise to statistically defined open-ended biological systems. These systems are rendered discrete units to satisfy practical needs and theoretical preferences associated with specific contexts of investigation. While it may be possible to defend a realist position regarding biological relations among organisms, biological populations are “made” when contextual features determine which kinds and degrees of relations to privilege over others, and so how to bound genes in space and time. Consequently, the objectivity of population-based approaches to species genome diversity cannot rest in the mind-independence of populations themselves.

Type
Genes, Development, and Evolution
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 989 - 1001
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

This research was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada in 1998–2000. Many thanks to John Beatty, Jim Griesemer, and everyone at the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science and the Program in History and Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Davis, for their support during and since this time. This work also benefited from discussions with Christopher Eliot, Roberta Millstein, Jenny Reardon, Richard Richards, and Bill Wimsatt, as well as audiences at California State University, Chico, the University of British Columbia, Dubrovnik 2000, ISHPSSB 2001, Northwest Conference 2002, and PSA 2002.

References

Brace, C. Loring (1964), “Reply”, Reply 5:319–320.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. Luca, Menozzi, Paolo, and Piazza, Alberto (1994), The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Judith (2002), “Species: The Real Ontological Issues”. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1950a), “Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution”, Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution 84:401–418.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1950b), “The Genetic Nature of Differences Among Men”, in Persons, Stow (ed.), Evolutionary Thought in America. New Haven: Yale University Press, 86–155.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. C., and Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1946), Heredity, Race, and Society. New York: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannett, Lisa, and Griesemer, James R. (2003a), “The ABO Blood Groups: Mapping the History and Geography of Genes in Homo sapiens”, in Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg and Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (eds.), Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. New York: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gannett, Lisa, and Griesemer, James R. (2003b), “Classical Genetics and the Geography of Genes”, in Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg and Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (eds.), Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. New York: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1974), “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”, A Radical Solution to the Species Problem 23:536–544.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James R. (2000), “Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance”, Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance 67:S348–S368.Google Scholar
Hiernaux, Jean (1964), “The Concept of Race and the Taxonomy of Mankind”, in Montagu, Ashley (ed.), The Concept of Race. London: Free Press of Glencoe, 29–45.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. (1965), “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis”, The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis 15:314–326, 16:1–18.Google Scholar
Juengst, Eric T. (1998), “Groups as Gatekeepers to Genomic Research: Conceptually Confusing, Morally Hazardous, and Practically Useless”, Groups as Gatekeepers to Genomic Research: Conceptually Confusing, Morally Hazardous, and Practically Useless 8(2): 183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, Philip (1984), “Species”, Species 51:308–333.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Frank (1962), “On the Nonexistence of Human Races”, On the Nonexistence of Human Races 3: 279.Google Scholar
Marks, Jonathan (1995), Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1942), Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, John H. (1996), “Is the Human Genome Diversity Project a Racist Enterprise?”, in Reynolds, Larry T. and Lieberman, Leonard (eds.), Race and Other Misadventures: Essays in Honor of Ashley Montagu in His Ninetieth Year. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall, 217–232.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1997), Evaluating Human Genetic Diversity. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Karl (1904), “On a Generalised Theory of Alternative Inheritance, with Special Reference to Mendel's Laws”, On a Generalised Theory of Alternative Inheritance, with Special Reference to Mendel's Laws 203:53–86.Google Scholar
Reardon, Jennifer E. (2002), Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genetics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Leslie (1991), “Scientific Split Over Sampling Strategy”, Scientific Split Over Sampling Strategy 252: 1615.Google Scholar
Roberts, Leslie (1992), “Genome Diversity Project: Anthropologists Climb (Gingerly) on Board”, Genome Diversity Project: Anthropologists Climb (Gingerly) on Board 258:1300–1301.Google ScholarPubMed
Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael (1990), “Vague Objects”, Vague Objects 99:535–557.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1931), “Evolution in Mendelian Populations”, Evolution in Mendelian Populations 16:97–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, Sewall (1943), “Isolation by Distance”, Isolation by Distance 28:114–138.Google ScholarPubMed