Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:24:13.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Logical Simplicity: A Challenge to Philosophy and to Social Inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Horace S. Fries
Horace S. Fries*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In part one of this paper we shall elucidate an operational concept of logical simplicity as it seems to function in natural science. Although this is a tentative and exploratory formulation, its novelty, relative to the great European philosophical tradition, seems to require a preliminary warning about misunderstandings.

In Part Two we shall apply the formulation to social inquiry and make a positive suggestion for further development of the proposal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1950 , pp. 207 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ames, Adelbert Jr., Nature and Origin of Perception: Preliminary Laboratory Manual, Mimeographed, Foreword, March, 1949, The Hanover Institute, Hanover, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
2. Ayer, A. J., The New Statesman and Nation, XXXVI, July 10, 1948.Google Scholar
3. Brodbeck, May, “The New Rationalism: Dewey's Theory of Induction,” Journal of Philosophy, XLVI, Nov. 24, 1949, pp. 780–91.Google Scholar
4. Cantril, Hadley, “The Nature of Social Perception,” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series 11, Vol. 10, Nov. 4, Feb., 1948, pp. 142–153.10.1111/j.2164-0947.1948.tb00026.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cantril, Hadley, Understanding Man's Social Behavior, Preliminary Notes, Office of Public Opinion Research, Princeton, N. J., 1947.Google Scholar
6. Cantril, Hadley; Ames, Adelbert Jr.; Hastorf, Albert H.; and Ittelson, William H., “Psychology and Scientific Research,” Science, 110, Nov. 4, 11, and 18, 1949, pp. 461–464, 491–497, and 517–522.10.1126/science.110.2862.461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Collingwood, R. G., An Autobiography, Oxford Univ. Press, 1939.Google Scholar
8. Collingwood, R. G., Metaphysics, Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar
9. The New Statesman and Nation, XXXVI, August 14, 1948.Google Scholar
10. Dewey, John, “Introduction,” Reconstruction in Philosophy, revised, Beacon Press, 1948.Google Scholar
11. Dewey, John, The Quest for Certainly, Minton, Balch, 1929.Google Scholar
12. Dewey, John, “Science and the Future of Society” in Intelligence in the Modern World, John Dewey's Philosophy, ed. by Joseph Ratner, Modern Library, 1939, pp. 343–63.Google Scholar
13. Fries, Horace S., “Dewey's Theory of Method,” The New Leader, Oct. 22, 1949, p. S-7.Google Scholar
14. Dewey, John, “Towards a Naturalistic Religion,” Crozer Quarterly, XXII, Oct., 1945, pp. 301–7.Google Scholar
15. Geiger, George R., “A Note on the Naturalistic Fallacy,” Philosophy of Science, 16, Oct., 1949, 336–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Geiger, George R., “Philosophic Humanism Today,” Antioch Review, VIII, Winter, 1948-49, pp. 447–62.Google Scholar
17. Hastorf, Albert H., “The Influence of Suggestion on the Relationship between Stimulus Size and Perceived Distance,” Journal of Psychology, 1950, 29, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. James, William, “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life,” in The Will to Believe, Longmans, Green, 1897.Google Scholar
19. Joad, C. E. M., “Logical Positivism, Fascism and Value,” The New Statesman and Nation, XXXVI, July 31, 1948, pp. 91–92.Google Scholar
20. Lilge, Frederic, The Abuse of Learning, Macmillan, 1948.Google Scholar
21. MacIver, A. M., “Towards A New Moral Philosophy,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. XLVI, 1945-46, pp. 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Otto, M. C., The Human Enterprise, Crofts, 1940, Ch. V.Google Scholar
23. Otto, M. C., “Professional Philosophy and the Public” in Philosophy in American Education by Blanshard, Brand and others, Harper, 1945.Google Scholar
24. Otto, M. C., Things and Ideals, Henry Holt, 1924, Ch. V.Google Scholar
25. “Oxonian,” “A Visit to Oxford,” The New Statesman and Nation, XXXV, June 26, 1948, pp. 518–9.Google Scholar
26. Schaefer-Simmern, Henry, The Unfolding of Artistic Activity, Univ. of Cal. Press, 1948.10.1525/9780520321465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Sherman, Hoyt L., Drawing by Seeing, Hinds, Hayden and Eldredge, 1947.Google Scholar
28. Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Library of Living Philosophers, 1946.Google Scholar
29. Wertheimer, Max, Productive Thinking, Harper, 1945.Google Scholar
30. Weyl, Hermann, “Mathematics and Logic,” The American Mathematical Monthly, 53, Jan., 1946.Google Scholar