Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:09:59.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Limits of Democratizing Science: When Scientists Should Ignore the Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2022

S. Andrew Schroeder Open the ORCID record for S. Andrew Schroeder [Opens in a new window]
S. Andrew Schroeder*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, US
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scientists are frequently called upon to “democratize” science, by bringing the public into scientific research. One appealing point for public involvement concerns the nonepistemic values involved in science. Suppose, though, a scientist invites the public to participate in making such value-laden determinations but finds that the public holds values the scientist considers morally unacceptable. Does the argument for democratizing science commit the scientist to accepting the public’s objectionable values, or may she veto them? I argue that there are a limited set of cases in which scientists can, consistently with a commitment to democratized science, set aside the public’s judgments.

Type
Symposia Paper
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 89 , Issue 5 , December 2022 , pp. 1034 - 1043
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brettschneider, Cory. 2005. “Balancing Procedures and Outcomes within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review.” Political Studies 53 (2):423–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2005. “Inserting the Public into Science.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, edited by Maasen, Sabine and Weingart, Peter, 153–69. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin. 2017. A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Kelly M., Trawalter, Sophie, Axt, Jordan R., and Oliver, M. Normal. 2016. “Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs about Biological Differences between Blacks and Whites.” PNAS 113 (16):4296–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Intemann, Kristen. 2015. “Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2):217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, Greg. 2021. “Does Democracy Require Value-Neutral Science? Analyzing the Legitimacy of Scientific Information in the Political Sphere.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 90:102–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, Simon Cãbulea. 2017. “No Compromise on Racial Equality.” In Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, edited by Rostbøll, Christian and Scavenius, Theresa, 34–49. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2011. “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (1):3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2015. “Justice: Social and Political.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 1, edited by Sobel, David, Valentine, Peter, and Wall, Steven, 9–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism (exp. ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S. Andrew. 2021. “Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 72 (2):545–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemplowska, Zofia, and Swift, Adam. 2018. “Dethroning Democratic Legitimacy.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 4, edited by Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven, 3–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viehoff, Daniel. 2014. “Democratic Equality and Political Authority.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2):337–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar