Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:12:12.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kelly on Ockham’s Razor and Truth-Finding Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Simon Fitzpatrick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses Kevin Kelly’s recent attempt to justify Ockham’s Razor in terms of truth-finding efficiency. It is argued that Kelly’s justification fails to warrant confidence in the empirical content of theories recommended by Ockham’s Razor. This is a significant problem if, as Kelly and many others believe, considerations of simplicity play a pervasive role in scientific reasoning, underlying even our best tested theories, for the proposal will fail to warrant the use of these theories in practical prediction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 298 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Earl Spurgin, Harry Gensler, and the referees for Philosophy of Science for helpful criticisms and suggestions. Research for this article was supported by a Summer Research Fellowship from John Carroll University.

References

Baker, Alan. 2011. “Simplicity.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/simplicity/.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1979. “What Is Justified Belief?” In Justification and Knowledge, ed. Pappas, George S., 1–23. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Juhl, Cory. 1993. “Bayesianism and Reliable Scientific Inquiry.” Philosophy of Science 60:302–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Kevin. 1996. The Logic of Reliable Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Kevin 2004. “Justification as Truth-Finding Efficiency: How Ockham’s Razor Works.” Minds and Machines 14:485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Kevin 2007. “A New Solution to the Puzzle of Simplicity.” Philosophy of Science 74 (Proceedings): 561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Kevin 2011. “Simplicity, Truth, and Probability.” In Handbook on the Philosophy of Statistics, ed. Bandyopadhyay, Prasanta and Forster, Malcolm, 983–1024. Oxford: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Eric, and Osherson, Daniel. 1998. Elements of Scientific Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Osherson, Daniel, Stob, Michael, and Weinstein, Scott. 1986. Systems That Learn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley. 1981. “Rational Prediction.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32:115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Oliver. 1999. “Means-Ends Epistemology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Oliver 2008. “The Co-discovery of Conservation Laws and Particle Families.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39:288–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Oliver 2012. “Formal Learning Theory.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/learning-formal/.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar