Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:05:05.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interlevel Experiments and Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience of Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Carl F. Craver
Carl F. Craver*
Affiliation:
Washington University
*
Send requests for reprints to Carl F. Craver, Department of Philosophy, Busch Hall, One Brookings Drive, Washington University, St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dominant neuroscientific theory of spatial memory is, like many theories in neuroscience, a multilevel description of a mechanism. The theory links the activities of molecules, cells, brain regions, and whole organisms into an integrated sketch of an explanation for the ability of organisms to navigate novel environments. Here I develop a taxonomy of interlevel experimental strategies for integrating the levels in such multilevel mechanisms. These experimental strategies include activation strategies, interference strategies, and additive strategies. These strategies are mutually reinforcing, providing a kind of interlevel and intratheoretic robustness that has not previously been recognized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue S3 , September 2002 , pp. S83 - S97
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, William, and Richardson, Robert C. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bickle, John (1998), Psychoneural Reduction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, Tim V. P. (1999), “Young Receptors Make Smart Mice”, Young Receptors Make Smart Mice 401:25–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Bogen, James (2001), “Functional Image Evidence: Some Epistemic Hot Spots”, in Machamer, P., Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.), Theory and Method in Neuroscience. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 173–199.Google Scholar
Bub, Jeffrey (1994), “Testing Models of Cognition Through the Analysis of Brain-Damaged Performance”, Testing Models of Cognition Through the Analysis of Brain-Damaged Performance 45:837–855.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2001), “Role Functions, Mechanisms and Hierarchy”, Role Functions, Mechanisms and Hierarchy 68:53–74.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (1998), Neural Mechanisms: On the Structure, Function, and Development of Theories in Neurobiology. PhD. dissertation. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F., and Darden, Lindley (2001), “Discovering Mechanisms in Neurobiology: The Case of Spatial Memory”, in Machamer, P., Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.), Theory and Method in Neuroscience. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 112–137.Google Scholar
Culp, Sylvia (1994), “Defending Robustness”, Proceedings of the Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. 46–57.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1991), Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. (in press), “Discovering the Mechanism of Protein Synthesis”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences.Google Scholar
Engert, F., and Bonhoeffer, T. (1999), “Dendritic Spine Changes Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity”, Dendritic Spine Changes Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity 399:66–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Frey, U., and Morris, R. G. M. (1998), “Synaptic Tagging: Implications for Late Maintenance of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation”, Synaptic Tagging: Implications for Late Maintenance of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation 21:181–188.Google ScholarPubMed
Glymour, Clark (1994), “On the Methods of Cognitive Neursopsychology”, On the Methods of Cognitive Neursopsychology 45:815–845.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1988), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John (1998), Having Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hebb, Donald O. (1949), The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heil, John (1949), “Multiple Realizability”, Multiple Realizability 36:189–204.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1993), Supervenience and the Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L⊘mo, Terje (1966), “Frequency Potentiation of Excitatory Synaptic Activity in the Dentate Area of the Hippocampal Formation”, Frequency Potentiation of Excitatory Synaptic Activity in the Dentate Area of the Hippocampal Formation 68 (suppl. 277) 128.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter K, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. (2000) “Thinking about Mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, John L. (1974), The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinow, Robert (1998), “Silencing the Controversy in LTP?”, Silencing the Controversy in LTP? 21:1226–1227.Google ScholarPubMed
Maletic-Savetic, M., Malinow, R., and Svoboda, K. (1999), “Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity”, Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity 283:1923–1926.Google Scholar
McHugh, T. J. et al. (1996), “Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDAR1 Knockout Mice”, Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDAR1 Knockout Mice 87:1339–1349.Google ScholarPubMed
Nagel, Ernest (1977), “Functional Explanation in Biology”, Functional Explanation in Biology 74:280–301.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, J., and Dostrovsky, J. (1971), “The Hippocampus as a Spatial Map. Preliminary Evidence from Unit Activity in the Freely Moving Rat”, The Hippocampus as a Spatial Map. Preliminary Evidence from Unit Activity in the Freely Moving Rat 34:171–175.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearl, Judea (2000), Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redish, A. D., and Touretzky, D. S. (1998), “The Role of the Hippocampus in Solving the Morris Water Maze”, The Role of the Hippocampus in Solving the Morris Water Maze 10(1): 73–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997), Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, Alexander, Mayford, Mark, Hawkins, Robert D., Kandel, Eric R., and Muller, Robert U. (1996), “Mice Expressing Activated CaMKII Low Frequency LTP and Do Not Form Stable Place Cells in the CA1 Region of the Hippocampus”, Mice Expressing Activated CaMKII Low Frequency LTP and Do Not Form Stable Place Cells in the CA1 Region of the Hippocampus 87:1351–1361.Google Scholar
Schachter, Daniel L., and Wagner, A.D. (1999), “Remembrance of Things Past”, Remembrance of Things Past 285:1503–1504.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1993), Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schouten, Maurice K. D. and Looren de Jong, H. (1999), “Reduction, Elimination and Levels: the Case of the LTP-Learning Link”, Reduction, Elimination and Levels: the Case of the LTP-Learning Link 12:237–262.Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, R. S., and Bechtel, William (1996), “PET: Exploring the Myth and the Method”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Supplement): S95–S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Y., Shimizu, E., Dube, G. R., Rampon, C., Kerchner, G. A., Zhuo, M., Liu, G., and Tsien, J. Z. (1999), “Genetic Enhancement of Learning and Memory in Mice”, Genetic Enhancement of Learning and Memory in Mice 401:63–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsien, J. Z., Chen, D. F., et al. (1996a), “Subregion- and Cell Type-Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain”, Subregion- and Cell Type-Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain 87:1317–1326.Google Scholar
Tsien, J. Z., Huerta, P. T., and Tonegawa, S. (1996b), “The Essential Role of Hippocampal CA1 NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Spatial Memory”, The Essential Role of Hippocampal CA1 NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Spatial Memory 87:1327–1338.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A., and McNaughton, Bruce (1993), “Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space”, Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space 261:1055–1058.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1986), “Forms of Aggregativity”, in Donagan, A., Perovich, A. N., and Wedin, M. V. (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel, 259–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1994), “Robustness, Reliabilty, and Overdetermination”, in Brewer, M. and Collins, B. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2000), “Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences”, Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences 52:197–254.Google Scholar
Zola-Morgan, S., and Squire, Larry (1993), “Neuroanatomy of Memory”, Neuroanatomy of Memory 16:547–563.Google Scholar