Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:20:59.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inductive Simplicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Robert Ackermann
Robert Ackermann*
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The fact that simplicity has been linked with induction by many philosophers of science, some of whom have proposed or supported criteria of “inductive simplicity,” means that the problem must be given some serious attention. I take “inductive simplicity” as a title, however, only by way of concession to these historical treatments, since it is precisely the burden of my paper to show that there is no such thing. So much for the conclusion. I shall spend the remainder of my time arguing for it.

Type
A Panel Discussion of Simplicity of Scientific Theories
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 152 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Braithewaite, Richard B. Scientific Explanation. Cambridge, 1955.Google Scholar
[2] Duhem, Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton,] 954.Google Scholar
[3] Goodman, Nelson. “Axiomatic Measurement of Simplicity.” The Journal of Philosophy, LII (1955), pp. 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Goodman, Nelson. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Simplicity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XIX (1959), pp. 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Goodman, Nelson. The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge, 1951.Google Scholar
[6] Jeffreys, Harold. Scientific Inference. Cambridge, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kemeny, John G. “The Use of Simplicity in Induction.” Philosophical Review, LVII (1953), pp. 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Lipka, Joseph. Graphical and Mechanical Computation. London, 1921.Google Scholar
[9] Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar