Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:08:30.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

R. A. Fumerton
R. A. Fumerton*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I want to cast doubt on the claim that there is a legitimate process of reasoning to the best explanation which can serve as an alternative to either straightforward inductive reasoning or a combination of inductive and deductive reasoning. I shall argue a) that paradigmatic cases of acceptable arguments to the best explanation must be considered enthymemes and b) that when the suppressed premises are made explicit we have all of the premises we need to present either a straightforward inductive argument or an argument employing both induction and deduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 589 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ennis, Robert H. (1968), “Enumerative Induction and Best Explanation,” The Journal of Philosophy 65: 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fales, Evan (1978), “Theoretical Simplicity and Defeasibility,” Philosophy of Science 45: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert H. (1965), “The Inference to the Best Explanation,” Philosophical Review 74: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert H. (1968), “Enumerative Induction as Inference to the Best Explanation,” The Journal of Philosophy 65: 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1888), A Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1959), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Fraser, Alexander (ed.), New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1969), “What's Really Wrong with Phenomenalism,” The Proceedings of the British Academy 55: 113–127.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Grover (1975), “Induction and Empiricism: A Bayesian-Frequentist Alternative.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VI, Maxwell, and Anderson, (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931), Collected Papers, Hartshorne, C. and Weis, P. (eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938), Experience and Prediction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1959), The Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1970), “Inductive Inference.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Brody, Baruch A. ed., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall: 597–612.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (1978), “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice,” The Journal of Philosophy 75: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar