Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:09:11.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypothetical Identities and Ontological Economizing: Comments on Causey's Program for the Unity of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Robert N. McCauley
Robert N. McCauley*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion Indiana Central University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 218 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Indiana Philosophical Association. I would like to express my gratitude to William Wimsatt with whom I have spent many hours discussing the issues of this paper.

References

Ager, T., Aronson, J., and Weingard, R. (1974), “Are Bridge Laws Really Necessary?”, Noûs 8: 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantz, D. (1976), “Does Physics Explain Chemistry”, Ph.D. dissertation, Committee in the Conceptual Foundations of Science, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Causey, R. (1972a), “Attribute Identities in Microreductions”, The Journal of Philosophy 64: 407–22.Google Scholar
Causey, R. (1972b), “Uniform Microreductions”, Synthese 25: 176–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causey, R. (1976), “Identities and Reduction: A Reply”, Noûs 10: 333–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causey, R. (1977), Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. and Maull, N. (1977), “Interfield Theories”, Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1968), Psychological Explanation, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1974), “Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)”, Synthese 28: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1972), “Reduction in Genetics—Biology or Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science 39: 491–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1974), Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hull, D. (1976), “Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction”, in PSA 1974, Cohen, R., Hooker, C., Michalos, A. and van Evra, J. (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 633–52.Google Scholar
Maull, N. (1977), “Unifying Science Without Reduction”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8: 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1965), “Physicalism”, The Philosophical Review 74: 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, T. (1976), “Theory Generalization, Problem Reduction, and the Unity of Science”, in PSA 1974. Cohen, , et al. (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel: 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattee, H. (1973), “The Physical Basis and Origin of Hierarchical Control”, in Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Pattee, H. (ed.), New York: George Braziller, 71–108.Google Scholar
Popper, K. and Eccles, J. (1977), The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. (1979), “Functionalism and Reductionism”, Philosophy of Science 46: 533–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1976), “Reduction in Genetics”, in PSA 1974, Cohen, et al. (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel: 653–69.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. (1974), “The Peripherally of Reduction in the Development of Molecular Biology”, Journal for the History of Biology 7: 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. (1976), “Reductionism in Biology: Prospects and Problems”, in PSA 1974, Cohen, , et al. (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel: 613–32.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1973), “The Organization of Complex Systems”, in Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Pattee, H. (ed.), New York: George Braziller: 1–27.Google Scholar
Wade, M. (1978), “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection”, Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1974), “Complexity and Organization”, in PSA 1972, Cohen, R. and Schaffner, K. (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1976), “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in Consciousness and the Brain, Globus, G., Maxwell, G., and Savodnik, I. (eds.), New York: Plenum Press, 205–67.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1978), “Reduction and Reductionism”, in Current Problems in Philosophy of Science, Asquith, P. and Kyburg, H. (eds.), East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1980), “Reductionistic Research Strategies and their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in Scientific Discovery Volume II: Case Studies, Nickles, T. (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar