Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:17:53.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Explanatory Reasoning Justifies Pursuit: A Peircean View of IBE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Rune Nyrup
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article develops and defends an account of inference to the best explanation according to which it first and foremost justifies pursuing hypotheses rather than accepting them as true. This sidesteps the issue of why better explanations should be more likely to be true. I defend an account of justification for pursuit, inspired by Peirce’s mature account of abduction, and develop it as a formal decision-theoretic model. This account provides a straightforward connection between explanatoriness and justification for pursuit.

Type
Explanation and Mechanisms
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , December 2015 , pp. 749 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Nancy Cartwright, Julian Reiss, Emmanuel Genot, and two referees for comments on earlier drafts, to the CHESS research group in Durham, and to the audiences at the Second Nordic Network for Philosophy of Science Meeting in Lund and the Ninth UK Integrated HPS Conference in Leeds.

References

Campos, Daniel. 2011. “On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation.” Synthese 180:419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douven, Igor. 2011. “Abduction.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.Google Scholar
Franklin, Allan. 1986. The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Allan 1993a. “Discovery, Pursuit, and Justification.” Perspectives on Science 1:252–84.Google Scholar
Franklin, Allan 1993b. The Rise and Fall of the Fifth Force: Discovery, Pursuit, and Justification in Modern Physics. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1987. “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18:501–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, James. 1999. The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKaughan, Daniel. 2008. “From Ugly Duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, Abduction, and the Pursuit of Scientific Theories.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44:446–68.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1932–58. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 8 vols. Ed. Paul Weiss, Charles Hartshorne, and Arthur Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Šešelja, Dunja, Kosolosky, Laszlo, and Straßer, Christian. 2012. “The Rationality of Scientific Reasoning in the Context of Pursuit: Drawing Appropriate Distinctions.” Philosophica 86:51–82.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Laurie. 1990. “Theory Pursuit: Between Discovery and Acceptance.” In Proceedings of the Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, ed. Fine, Arthur, Forbes, Micky, and Wessels, Linda, 467–83. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar