Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:04:51.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History and Science in Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Marc J. Swartz*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass

Extract

The basic issues which this paper will be concerned with are: how has history been defined, what has been asked about history, and what sort of answers have been found. These questions may also be stated as: what is the nature of historical theory (since “theory” here will mean any set of definitions, assumptions, and operating hypotheses) and how do different theories affect what may “be done” with history.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am indebted to the following who have been kind enough to read and comment on this paper: Cora DuBois, Clifford and Hildreth Geertz, Arnold Green, John and Ann Fisher, Robert LeVine, and David Schneider. I am also indebted to my wife, Audrey R. Swartz for considerable assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

References

Benedict, Ruth, 1932, Franz Boas as an ethnologist. Memoir Series AAA, no. 66, Menasha. Boas, FranzGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1904, The history of anthropology. Science, 20: 513–51. Lancaster, Pa.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1920, The methods of ethnology. American Anthropologist, 22: 311–31. Menasha.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1932, Aims of anthropological research. Science, 76: 605–60. Lancaster, Pa.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1932a, Anthropology and modern life. New York, W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1936, History and science in anthropology: a reply. American Anthropologist, 38: 137–13. Menasha.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth, 1940, Mythology and folklore of North American Indians. In Franz Boas: Race, language, and culture, New York, MacMillan.Google Scholar
Goldenweisser, A. A., 1917, The anatomy of the social. American Anthropologist, 19: 447–44. Menasha.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G., 1942, The function of general laws in history. Journal of Philosophy, 39: 459–45. Lancaster, Pa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1917, The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19: 163213, Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1918, Possibility of a social psychology. American Journal of Sociology. 23: 633650, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1920, Review of Lowie's Primitive Society. American Anthropologist, 22: 377–37, Menasha.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1936, So called social science. Journal of Social Philosophy, 1: 317–31.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1944, Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley, U. of Cal. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1952, History and science in anthropology. In Kroeber, A. L.: The nature of culture, pp. 6365, Chicago, U. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Ralph, 1938, The present status of anthropology. Science, 87: 241–24, Lancaster, Pa.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowie, R. H. 1920, Primitive Society. New York, Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
Lowie, R. H. 1936, Cultural anthropology: a science. American Journal of Sociology, 42: 301–30, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, R. H. 1946, Evolution in cultural anthropology: a reply to Leslie White. American Anthropologist, 48: 223–22, Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest, 1952, The logic of historical analysis. In H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck (eds.): Readings in Philosophy of Science, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 688701.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, 1917, Do we need a superorganic? American Anthropologist, 19: 441447, Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Leslie 1945, History, evolution and functionalism. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1: 221–22, AlbuquerqueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Leslie 1946, Kroeber's “Configurations of Culture Growth”, American Anthropologist, 48: 7893, MenashaCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed