Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:40.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Relatedness and the Evolution of Altruism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Samir Okasha
Samir Okasha*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of York, U.K.
*
Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of York, Heslington, York, YO1 5DD, U.K. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In their recent book, Elliott Sober and David Wilson (1998) argue that evolutionary biologists have wrongly regarded kinship as the exclusive means by which altruistic behavior can evolve, at the expense of other mechanisms. I argue that Sober and Wilson overlook certain genetical considerations which suggest that kinship is likely to be a more powerful means for generating complex altruistic adaptations than the alternative mechanisms they propose.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 138 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to the late William Hamilton, John Maynard Smith, Alex Rosenberg, Elliott Sober, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and discussion.

References

Dawkins, Richard (1982), The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Anthony J., Gelbart, William, Miller, Jeffrey, and Lewontin, Richard (1999), Modern Genetic Analysis. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William D. (1964), “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I, II”, The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I, II 7:1–16, 17–52; Reprinted in Hamilton 1996, 11–84.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William D. (1975), “Innate Social Attitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics”, in Fox, Robin (ed.), Biosocial Anthropology. London: Malaby Press; Reprinted in Hamilton 1996, 315–352.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William D. (1996), Narrow Roads of Gene Land, vol. 1. Oxford: Freeman/Spektrum.Google Scholar
Hurst Laurence, Anne Atlan, and Bengtsson, Bengt (1996), “Genetic Conflicts”, Genetic Conflicts 71:317–364.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John (1964), “Group Selection and Kin Selection”, Group Selection and Kin Selection 201:1145–1146.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John (1976), “Group Selection”, Group Selection 51:277–283.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John (1998), “The Origin of Altruism”, The Origin of Altruism 393:639–640.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir (2001), “Why Won't the Group Selection Controversy Go Away?”, Why Won't the Group Selection Controversy Go Away? 52:25–50.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David S. (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. (1971), “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Uyenoyama, Marcy K., and Feldman, Marc W. (1980), “Theories of Kin and Group Selection: A Population Genetics Perspective”, Theories of Kin and Group Selection: A Population Genetics Perspective 17:380–414.Google Scholar
Williams, George C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, David S., and Dugatkin, Lee (1997), “Group Selection and Assortative Interactions”, Group Selection and Assortative Interactions 149:336–351.Google Scholar