Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:26:31.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Extensionality of Causation and Causal-Explanatory Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Michael E. Levin
Michael E. Levin*
Affiliation:
City College of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that 'c' occurs extensionally in 'c caused e' and 'D' occurs extensionally in 'c caused e because c is D'. I claim that this has been insufficiently appreciated because the two contexts are often run together and because it has not been clear that the description D of c is among the referents of an explanatory argument. I argue as well that Hume's analysis of causation is consistent with taking causation to be a relation between single events, and that even if events are eliminated as virtual entities, extensionality holds for all terms in the resulting context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 266 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I wish to thank Lawrence Stern for stimulating discussions about causality and explanation, and Margarita Garcia for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Achinstein, P. “Causation, Transparency, and Emphasis.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1975): 000–000.10.1080/00455091.1975.10716094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Causality and Extensionality.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969): 152–169.10.2307/2024330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Causality and Determination.” In Causation and Conditionals. Edited by Sosa, E. London: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Berofsky, B. Determinism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. “Causal Relations.” Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967): 691–703.10.2307/2023853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. “Contrastive Statements.” Philosophical Review 81 (1972): 411–437.10.2307/2183886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, D. “Quantification into Causal Contexts.” In Reference and Modality. Edited by Linsky, L. London: University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 245–264.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. “On Kim's Account of Events and Event-identity.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974): 327–336.10.2307/2024874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriven, M. “Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations.” In The Nature of Historical Explanation. Edited by Gardiner, P. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Sher, G. “On Event-Identity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (1974): 39–47.10.1080/00048407412341021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. “Causal Relations.” Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967): 704–713.10.2307/2023854CrossRefGoogle Scholar