Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T16:33:48.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanatory Justice: The Case of Disjunctive Explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an effort to explicate the concept of explanatory power in a Bayesian framework by constructing explanatory measures. It has been argued that those measures should not violate the principle of explanatory justice, which states that explanatory power cannot be extended “for free.” I argue, by formal means, that one recent measure claiming to be immune from explanatory injustice fails to be so. I end by concluding that the explanatory justice criticism can be dissolved, given a natural interpretation of the concept of negative explanatory power.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 442 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†.

I would like to thank Jan Sprenger for his comments on an earlier draft. Thanks also to the reviewers of this journal for helpful comments.

References

Cohen, Michael P. 2016. “On Three Measures of Explanatory Power with Axiomatic Representations.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 1077–89..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crupi, Vincenzo, and Tentori, Katya. 2012. “A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems).” Philosophy of Science 79 (3): 365–85..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemes, Ken. 1998. “Hypothetico-Deductivism, the Current State of Play: The Criterion of Empirical Significance, Endgame.” Erkenntnis 49:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, I. J. 1960. “Weight of Evidence, Corroboration, Explanatory Power, Information and the Utility of Experiments.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 22 (2): 319–31..Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G., and Oppenheim, Paul. 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15 (2): 135–75..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, Timothy. 2003. “Confirmation, Heuristics, and Explanatory Reasoning.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54:553–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N. 2012. “Comparing Probabilistic Measures of Explanatory Power.” Philosophy of Science 78 (5): 813–29..Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N., and Sprenger, Jan. 2011. “The Logic of Explanatory Power.” Philosophy of Science 78 (1): 105–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N., and Sprenger, Jan 2014. “Explanatory Power and Explanatory Justice.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Jan. 2011. “Hypothetico-Deductive Confirmation.” Philosophy Compass 6:497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar