Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-gmt7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T02:00:08.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemic Value of Understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Henk W. de Regt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the epistemic value of understanding and offers an account of the role of understanding in science. First, I discuss the objectivist view of the relation between explanation and understanding, defended by Carl Hempel and J. D. Trout. I challenge this view by arguing that pragmatic aspects of explanation are crucial for achieving the epistemic aims of science. Subsequently, I present an analysis of these pragmatic aspects in terms of ‘intelligibility’ and a contextual account of scientific understanding based on this notion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 5 , December 2009 , pp. 585 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

I thank Hans Radder for comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

Brown, Harold I. (1988), Rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Harold I. (2000), “Judgment, Role in Science”, in Newton-Smith, W. H. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell, 194–202.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Regt, Henk W. (2001), “Space-Time Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories”, Space-Time Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories 32B:243–265.Google Scholar
De Regt, Henk W. (2009), “Understanding and Scientific Explanation”, in de Regt, Henk W., Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai (eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Regt, Henk W., and Dieks, Dennis (2005), “A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding”, A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding 144:137–170.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Tarja (2005), “Models, Representation and Mediation”, Models, Representation and Mediation 72:1260–1271.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977), “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in Kuhn, Thomas S., The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Hugh (2005), Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen (1990), Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary, and Morrison, Margaret, eds. (1999), Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1958), Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reber, Arthur S. (1993), Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, David R. (2005), “Implicit Learning”, in Lamberts, Koen and Goldstone, Robert (eds.), Handbook of Cognition. London: Sage, 202–220.Google Scholar
Trout, J. D. (2002), “Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding”, Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding 69:212–233.Google Scholar
Trout, J. D. (2007), “The Psychology of Explanation”, The Psychology of Explanation 2:564–596.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar