Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T22:37:00.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: The Truth and Falsity of Definitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Rem B. Edwards
Rem B. Edwards*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 76 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wesley C. Salmon, Logic, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963, p. 93.

2 Francis H. Parker and Henry B. Veatch, Logic as a Human instrument, New York: Harper and Brothers, 1959, p. 81.

3 L. S. Stebbing, A Modern Introduction to Logic, London: Methuen & Co., 1933, p. 426.

4 Morris R. Cohen, and Ernest Nagel, An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1934, p. 230.

5 I. M. Copi, Introduction to Logic, New York: Macmillan, 1961, p. 102.

6 Max Black, Critical Thinking, New York: Prentice Hall, 1946, p. 190.

7 Monroe C. Beardsley, Practical Logic, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1950, p. 166.

8 Monroe C. Beardsley, and Elizabeth Lane Beardsley, Philosophical Thinking, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965, p. 25.

9 Beardsley and Beardsley, p. 25.

10 Parker and Veatch, p. 81.

11 Salmon, p. 93.

12 Parker and Veatch, pp. 81-82.

13 Salmon, pp. 93-94.