Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T09:00:53.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Reply to a Reaction: Second Remarks on Brodbeck's Objectivism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Joseph Margolis
Joseph Margolis*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 1966 , pp. 293 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Broad, C. D., Scientific Thought (London, 1923), Introduction.Google Scholar
[2] Broad, C. D., The Mind and Its Place in Nature (London, 1925).Google Scholar
[3] Brodbeck, May, “Meaning and Action,” Philosophy of Science, 30 (1963), pp. 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Brodbeck, May, “Objectivism and Interaction: A Reaction to Margolis,” Philosophy of Science, 33 (1966), pp. 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Margolis, Joseph, “Objectivism and Interactionism,” Philosophy of Science, 33 (1966), pp. 118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science (London, 1958).Google Scholar