Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:30:56.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Professor Marcucci on Whewell's Idealism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Robert E. Butts*
Affiliation:
Talbot College, University of Western Ontario

Extract

Professor Marcucci's book on Whewell [6] is a comprehensive expository treatment of Whewell's philosophy of science. The work contains chapters on Whewell's theory of ideas, the fundamental principles of his philosophy of science, his views on mathematics and mechanics, and on his philosophy of induction and philosophy of discovery. In addition there is a chapter on the English reception of Whewell's thought. Professor Marcucci's notes are rich, both in references to Whewell's many critics and to nearly all of the extant literature on Whewell. Indeed, no full study of Whewell has as yet appeared that makes better or more extensive use of all the relevant literature on Whewell.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This review could not have been written without extensive help with the Italian given the author by Dr. Jaroslav Havelka, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Blanché, Robert, Le Rationalisme de Whewell, (Paris, 1935).Google Scholar
[2] Butts, Robert E., “Discussion: On Walsh's Reading of Whewell's View of Necessity,” Philosophy of Science, 32, 2 (April 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Butts, Robert E., “Necessary Truth in Whewell's Theory of Science,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 3, (July 1965).Google Scholar
[4] Ducasse, C. J., “Whewell's Philosophy of Scientific Discovery I,” Philosophy Review, 60 (1951); “Whewell's Philosophy of Scientific Discovery II,” ibid.Google Scholar
[5] Mansel, H. L., Prolegomena Logica, An Inquiry into the Psychological Character of Logical Processes, (Oxford, 1851).Google Scholar
[6] Marcucci, Silvestro, L' “Idealismo” Scientifico di William Whewell, Università degli studi di Pisa (Instituto di Filosofia, 1963).Google Scholar
[7] Todhunter, Isaac, William Whewell, D. D., (London, 1876).Google Scholar
[8] von Wright, G. H., The Logical Problem of Induction, 2nd. rev. ed. (Oxford, 1957), Chs. III, IV.Google Scholar
[9] Walsh, H. T., “Whewell on Necessity,” Philosophy of Science, 29, 2 (April 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Whewell, W., History of the Inductive Sciences, 1st ed. (London, 1837), 3 vols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Whewell, W., The History of Scientific Ideas, (London, 1858), 2 vols.Google Scholar
[12] Whewell, W., “On the Fundamental Antithesis of Philosophy,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 7, pt. II (1844).Google Scholar
[13] Whewell, W., “Of the Intellectual Powers According to Plato,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, (read Nov. 12, 1855).Google Scholar
[14] Whewell, W., “Of the Platonic Theory of Ideas,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, (read Nov. 10, 1856).Google Scholar
[15] Whewell, W., On the Philosophy of Discovery, (London, 1860).Google Scholar
[16] Whewell, W., “On Plato's Notion of Dialectic,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, (read May 7, 1855).Google Scholar
[17] Whewell, W., “On Plato's Survey of the Sciences,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, (read April 23, 1855).Google Scholar
[18] Whewell, W., The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. 2nd. ed. (London, 1847), 2 vols.Google Scholar
[19] Whewell, W., Of the Plurality of Worlds, dated 1853, containing 5 chapters printed but deleted in the published work (Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge).Google Scholar
[20] Whewell, W., “Second Memoir on the Fundamental Antithesis of Philosophy,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 7, pt. V (1848).Google Scholar