No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Discussion: Moor and Schlesinger on Explanation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1979
References
Cupples, B. (1977), “Three Types of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 44: 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, R., Kaplan, D., and Montague, R. (1961), “Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 28: 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C., and Oppenheim, P. (1965), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Reprinted in C. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 245–295. Originally published 1945.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1961), “Explanation Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 28: 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moor, J. (1976), “The Cancellation of Symmetrical Contraries and The Principle of Significant Contradictories.” Philosophy of Science 43: 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1974), Confirmation and Confirmability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1978), “On a Matter of Principle.” Philosophy of Science 45: 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar