Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:22:07.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Comments on Comments on Comments

A Reply to Margenau and Wigner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Hilary Putnam
Hilary Putnam*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bohr, N., “Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics,” in A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist, Tudor, 1951, New York.Google Scholar
[2] Margenau, H. and Wigner, E. P., “Comments on Professor Putnam's Comments,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, July 1962, pp. 292–293.10.1086/287878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Putnam, H., “Comments on the paper of David Sharp,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, July 1961, pp. 234–239.10.1086/287807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Sharp, D. H., “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-examined,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28. no. 3, July 1961, pp. 225–233.10.1086/287806CrossRefGoogle Scholar