Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Teller, Paul
2010.
“Saving the Phenomena” Today.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 5,
p.
815.
Perini, Laura
2010.
New Waves in Philosophy of Science.
p.
131.
Parker, Wendy S.
2011.
When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 4,
p.
579.
Soler, Léna
Wieber, Frédéric
Allamel-Raffin, Catherine
Gangloff, Jean-Luc
Dufour, Catherine
and
Trizio, Emiliano
2013.
Calibration: A Conceptual Framework Applied to Scientific Practices Which Investigate Natural Phenomena by Means of Standardized Instruments.
Journal for General Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.
Chen, Ruey-Lin
2013.
Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics.
Vol. 3,
Issue. ,
p.
101.
Mendritzki, Stefan
2014.
To stylize or not to stylize, is it a fact then? Clarifying the role of stylized facts in empirical model evaluation.
Journal of Economic Methodology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
107.
Döring, Martin
Kollek, Regine
Brüninghaus, Anne
and
Petersen, Imme
2015.
Contextualizing Systems Biology.
p.
27.
Nguyen, James
2016.
On the Pragmatic Equivalence between Representing Data and Phenomena.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 2,
p.
171.
Frigg, Roman
and
Nguyen, James
2017.
Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science.
p.
49.
Karaca, Koray
2018.
Lessons from the Large Hadron Collider for model-based experimentation: the concept of a model of data acquisition and the scope of the hierarchy of models.
Synthese,
Vol. 195,
Issue. 12,
p.
5431.
Kellen, David
2019.
A Model Hierarchy for Psychological Science.
Computational Brain & Behavior,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
160.
Leonelli, Sabina
2019.
What distinguishes data from models?.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
Frigg, Roman
and
Nguyen, James
2020.
Modelling Nature: An Opinionated Introduction to Scientific Representation.
Vol. 427,
Issue. ,
p.
51.
Cristalli, Claudia
and
Sánchez-Dorado, Julia
2021.
Colligation in modelling practices: From Whewell’s tides to the San Francisco Bay Model.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 85,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Bokulich, Alisa
and
Parker, Wendy
2021.
Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Fletcher, Samuel C.
2021.
The role of replication in psychological science.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Antoniou, Antonis
2021.
What is a data model?.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 4,
Boge, Florian J.
2022.
Two Dimensions of Opacity and the Deep Learning Predicament.
Minds and Machines,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
Campi, Marco C.
2023.
Inductive knowledge under dominance.
Synthese,
Vol. 201,
Issue. 6,
Matta, Corrado
Lindvall, Jannika
and
Ryve, Andreas
2024.
The Mechanistic Rewards of Data and Theory Integration for Theory-Based Evaluation.
American Journal of Evaluation,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
110.