Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:29:55.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dark Matter Double Bind: Astrophysical Aspects of the Evidential Warrant for General Relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

William L. Vanderburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dark matter problem in astrophysics exposes an underappreciated weakness in the evidential warrant for General Relativity (GR). The “dark matter double bind” entails that GR gets no differential evidential support from dynamical phenomena occurring at scales larger than our solar system, as compared to members of a significant class of rival gravitation theories. These rivals are each empirically indistinguishable from GR for phenomena taking place at solar system scales, but make predictions that may differ radically from GR's at larger scales. Thus the typical confidence in the universal applicability of GR is insufficiently warranted in the present evidential context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 812 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I am very grateful to the following people for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper: Virginia Trimble, Chris Smeenk, Kathleen Okruhlik, Bill Harper, Andrew Wayne, Bob Feleppa, and David Soles.

References

Buote, David A., Jeltema, Tesla E., Canizares, Claude R., and Garmire, Gordon P. (2002), “Chandra Evidence for a Flattened, Triaxial Dark Matter Halo in the Elliptical Galaxy NGC 720”, Chandra Evidence for a Flattened, Triaxial Dark Matter Halo in the Elliptical Galaxy NGC 720 577:183–196.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard, and Smith, George E. (eds.) (2002), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John (1992), Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John, and Janssen, Michel (1993), “Einstein's Explanation of the Motion of Mercury's Perihelion”, in Earman, John, Janssen, Michel and Norton, John D. (eds.), The Attraction of Gravitation. Boston: Birkhauser, 129–172.Google Scholar
Edery, A., and Paranjape, M. B. (1998), “Classical Tests for Weyl Gravity: Deflection of Light and Time Delay”, Classical Tests for Weyl Gravity: Deflection of Light and Time Delay D 58: 024011.Google Scholar
Ellis, G.F.R. (1985), “Observational Cosmology After Kristian and Sachs”, in Stoeger (1985a), 475–86.Google Scholar
Ellis, G.F.R. (1999), “The Different Nature of Cosmology”, Astronomy and Geophysics (August 1999): 4.20–4.23.Google Scholar
Glymour, Clark (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, William (1997), “Isaac Newton on Empirical Success and Scientific Method”, in Earman, John and Norton, John D. (eds.), The Cosmos of Science: Essays of Exploration. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 55–86.Google Scholar
Harper, William (2002), “Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation”, in Cohen and Smith (2002), 174–201.Google Scholar
Harper, William, and DiSalle, Robert (1996), “Inferences from Phenomena in Gravitational Physics”, Inferences from Phenomena in Gravitational Physics 63 (Proceedings): S46–54.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D. (1992), “Conformal Gravity and the Flatness Problem”, Conformal Gravity and the Flatness Problem 391:429–432.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D. (1993), “Linear Potentials and Galactic Rotation Curves”, Linear Potentials and Galactic Rotation Curves 419:150–154.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D. (1994), “Open Questions in Classical Gravity”, Open Questions in Classical Gravity 24:487–511.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D. (1996), “Local and Global Gravity”, Local and Global Gravity 26:1683–1709.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D., and Kazanas, Demosthenes (1989), “Exact Vacuum Solution to Conformal Weyl Gravity and Galactic Rotation Curves”, Exact Vacuum Solution to Conformal Weyl Gravity and Galactic Rotation Curves 342:635–638.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Philip D., and Kazanas, Demosthenes (1994), “Newtonian Limit of Conformal Gravity and the Lack of Necessity of the Second Order Poisson Equation”, Newtonian Limit of Conformal Gravity and the Lack of Necessity of the Second Order Poisson Equation 26.4:337–361.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Mordehai (1983), “A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics as a Possible Alternative to the Hidden Mass Hypothesis”, A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics as a Possible Alternative to the Hidden Mass Hypothesis 270:365–70.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Mordehai (1986),. “Solutions for the Modified Newtonian Dynamics Field Equations”, Solutions for the Modified Newtonian Dynamics Field Equations 302:617–25.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Mordehai (1994), “Dynamics with a Non-Standard Inertia-Acceleration Relation: An Alternative to Dark Matter in Galactic Systems”, Dynamics with a Non-Standard Inertia-Acceleration Relation: An Alternative to Dark Matter in Galactic Systems 229:384–415.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1999), The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reid, M. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Vermeulen, R. C., and Treuhaft, R. N. (1999), “The Proper Motions of Sgr A*: I. First VLBA Results”, <http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9905/9905075.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Sanders, R. H. (1996), “The Published Extended Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies: Confrontation with Modified Dynamics”, The Published Extended Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies: Confrontation with Modified Dynamics 473:117–29.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. H. (1999), “The Virial Discrepancy in Clusters of Galaxies in the Context of Modified Newtonian Dynamics”, The Virial Discrepancy in Clusters of Galaxies in the Context of Modified Newtonian Dynamics 512:L23–L26.Google Scholar
Smith, George (2002), “The Methodology of the Principia”, in Cohen and Smith (2002), 138–173.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. (ed.) (1985a), Theory and Observational Limits in Cosmology: Proceedings of the Vatican Observatory Conference. Vatican City: Specola VaticanaGoogle Scholar
Stoeger, William R. (1985b), “The Binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16 and its Role in Testing Theories of Gravity”, in Stoeger (1985a), 497–509.Google Scholar
Tayler, Roger J. (1991), The Hidden Universe. Chirchester, UK: Ellis Horwood Limited.Google Scholar
Trimble, Virginia (1987), “Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe”, Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe 25:425–472.Google Scholar
Trimble, Virginia (1990), “History of Dark Matter in the Universe (1922–1974)”, in Bertotti, B., Balbinot, R., and Bergia, S. (eds.), Modern Cosmology in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 355–362.Google Scholar
Trimble, Virginia (1993), “Dark Matter”, in Hetherington, Noriss S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cosmology: Historical, Philosophical and Scientific Foundations of Modern Cosmology. New York: Garland, 148–58.Google Scholar
Vanderburgh, William L. (2001), Dark matters in contemporary astrophysics: A case study in theory choice and evidential reasoning, Ph.D. diss., University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Vanderburgh, William L. (in preparation), “Astrophysical Dark Matter: An Introduction to its History and Philosophical Significance”.Google Scholar
van Stratten, W., Bailes, M., Britton, M., Kulkarni, S. R., Anderson, S. B., Manchester, R. N., and Sarkissian, J. (2001), “A Test of General Relativity from the Three-Dimensional Orbital Geometry of a Binary Pulsar”, A Test of General Relativity from the Three-Dimensional Orbital Geometry of a Binary Pulsar 412:158–160.Google Scholar
Walker, Mark (1994), “Lensing in Alternative Gravity”, Lensing in Alternative Gravity 430:463–466.Google Scholar
Will, Clifford M. (1993), Theory and Experiment in Gravitation Physics, rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar