Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:24:13.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Notice: Kuhn, Conant and Everything—A Full or Fuller Account

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Hanne Andersen
Hanne Andersen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 258 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1955), “Can the Layman Know Science?”, unpublished talk given at State Teachers College, Bridgewater, MA, December 13, 1955. Thomas S. Kuhn Papers (MC 240), Institute Archives and Special Collections, MIT Libraries, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1957), Review of A. Koyré, A Documentary History of the Problem of Fall from Kepler to Newton. De Motu Gravium Naturaliter Cadentium in Hypothesi Terrae Motae (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society 1955), Isis 48: 91–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1958), Review of A. Koyré, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins 1957), Science 127: 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962a), Comment on MacKinnon, “Intellect and Motive in Scientific Inventors: Implications for Supply”, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 379–384.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962b), Comment on Siegel: “Scientific Discovery and the Rate of Invention”, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 450–457.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1966), Review of J. Agassi: Towards an Historiography of Science ('s-Gravenhage: Mouton 1963). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1967), “The Turn to Recent Science”, Isis 58: 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970), “Alexandre Koyré and the History of Science”, Encounter 34: 67–69.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1980), “The Halt and the Blind: Philosophy and History of Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. et al. (1963), Discussion (on The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research), in Crombie, A.C. (ed.), Scientific Change. Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, from Antiquity to the Present. London: Heineman, 381–395.Google Scholar