Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:28:02.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concept of Values in Contemporary Philosophical Value Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Abraham Edel
Abraham Edel*
Affiliation:
The City College of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term “value” has a wide range of current usage in philospohy and the sciences. Descriptively, a man's “values” may refer to all his attitudes for-or-against anything. His values include his perferences and avoidances, his desire-objects and aversion-objects, his pleasure and pain tendencies, his goals, ideals, interests and disinterests, what he takes to be right and wrong, good and evil, beautiful and ugly, useful and useless, his approvals and disapprovals, his criteria of taste and standards of judgment, and so forth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 198 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Presented at a meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association and Section L of the AAAS, December 29, 1951.

References

1. Bateson, Gregory and Mead, Margaret, Balinese Character, A Photographic Analysis. Special Publications of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. II, Dec. 7, 1942.Google Scholar
1a. Benedict, Ruth, Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1934.Google Scholar
2. Bergson, Henri, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, translated by Audra, Brereton and Carter. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1935.Google Scholar
3. Cohen, Morris R., “The Process of Judicial Legislation” in his Law and the Social Order. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1933. Cf. Second Report of the Committee on Cooperative Research in Values (a series of methodologically oriented analyses of the Frankfurter decision in the Gobitis case), 1950. Distribution office: Dept. of Philosophy, Wayne University, Detroit.Google Scholar
4. Dewey, John, “Theory of Valuation.” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, II, 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939.Google Scholar
5. Edel, Abraham, “Coordinates of Criticism in Ethical Theory,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, VII, 4, June 1947, pp. 543–577.Google Scholar
6. Edel, Abraham, “The Evaluation of Ideals,” Journal of Philosophy, XLII, 21, Oct. 11, 1945, pp. 561–577.Google Scholar
7. Fromm, Erich, Man For Himself. New York: Rinehart and Co., 1947.Google Scholar
8. Hartmann, Nicolai, Ethics, translated by Stanton Coit, 3 vol. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1932.Google Scholar
9. Hull, Clark L., “Value, Valuation, and Natural Science Methodology,” Philosophy of Science, XI, 3, 1944, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
10. Isenberg, Arnold, “Cordelia Absent”, Shakespeare Quarterly, II, 3, 1951.Google Scholar
10a. Kluckhohn, Kluckhohn Clyde, “Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action”, in Parsons, T. and Shils, E. A. (ed.), Towards a General Theory of Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
11. Kohler, Wolfgang, The Place of Value in A World of Facts. New York: Liveright Publishing Corp., 1938.Google Scholar
12. Laird, John, The Idea of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
13. Lewis, Clarence I., An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. Lasalle, Ill.: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1946.Google Scholar
14. Lilienthal, David E., TV A, Democracy on the March. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1944.Google Scholar
14a. Mead, Margaret (ed.), Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive Peoples. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Moore, George E., Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.Google Scholar
16. Perry, Ralph Barton, General Theory of Value. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1926.Google Scholar
17. Stevenson, Charles L., Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
18. Twichell, Allan A., An Appraisal Method for Measuring the Quality of Housing: A Yardstick for Health Officers, Housing Officials and Planners. Pt. I: Nature and Uses of the Method. American Public Health Association, Committee on the Hygiene of Housing, 1790 Broadway, New York 19, N. Y., 1945.Google Scholar
19. Urban, Wilbur M., Fundamentals of Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1930. (Cf. his earlier Valuation: Its Nature and Laws, London, 1909.)Google Scholar