Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:09.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Causal Theory of Time: A Critique of Grünbaum's Version

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Hugh M. Lacey*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney

Abstract

After precisely specifying the thesis of the causal theory of time, Grünbaum's program developed to support this thesis is examined. Four objections to his definition of temporal order in terms of a more primitive causal relation are put and held to be conclusive. Finally, the philosophical arguments that Grünbaum has proposed supporting the desirability of establishing a causal theory of time are shown to be either invalid or inconclusive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Professors W. Salmon and M. Scriven for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Grünbaum, A., Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[2] Prior, A. N., Time and Modality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar
[3] Putnam, H., “An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Geometry,” in vol. II, Philosophy of Science, The Delaware Seminar (ed. B. Baumrin).Google Scholar
[4] Rankin, K. W., “Referential Identifiers,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1, 1964, pp. 233243.Google Scholar
[5] Reichenbach, H., The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1956.10.1063/1.3059791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Reichenbach, H., The Philosophy of Space and Time, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1958.Google Scholar
[7] Scriven, M., “Causes, Connections, and Conditions in History,” Philosophical Analysis and History (ed. W. Dray).Google Scholar
[8] Sellars, W., “Time and the World Order,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III (eds. H. Feigl and G. Maxwell).Google Scholar
[9] Whitrow, G. H., The Natural Philosophy of Time, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1961.Google Scholar