Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:29:38.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Best Explanation of a Scientific Paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Lipton
Peter Lipton*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Frederick Suppe would have us reject hypothetico-deductivism, Bayesianism, and Inference to the Best Explanation, on the grounds that none of these philosophical models can account for the argumentative structure that virtually all data-based papers in science share, a structure exemplified by W. Jason Morgan's landmark paper in plate tectonics (Morgan 1968). At the core of that putative universal structure is a strategy whereby recalcitrant data are given interpretations designed to show that the theory or scientific model being advanced need not take them into account. Pity Karl Popper: immunizing stratagems are the soul of scientific argument.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 406 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Send reprint requests to the author, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK.

‡

I am grateful to Anjan Chakravartty, Greg Radick, and Paul Teller for illuminating discussions.

References

Lipton, Peter (1991), Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter (1993), “Is the Best Good Enough?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XCIII: 89–104. Reprinted in David Papineau (ed.) (1996), The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. Jason (1968), “Rises, Trenches, Great Faults, and Crustal Blocks”, Journal of Geophysical Research 73/6 (March 15): 1959–1982.10.1029/JB073i006p01959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1989), Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar