Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:15:22.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomism in Crisis: An Analysis of the Current High Energy Paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

K. Shrader-Frechette
K. Shrader-Frechette*
Affiliation:
University of Louisville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the appearance of T. S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, scholars from various fields have sought to evaluate their disciplines in the light of Kuhnian criteria for scientific change. In this paper I argue that a new paradigm seems needed in high energy physics, and that there is no more reason to say that matter is made of elementary particles, than to say that it is not.

My argument, that high energy physics is approaching a state of crisis, and that a new paradigm is needed, is based on an examination of two events which, according to Kuhn, presage a conceptual revolution: (1) the “old” paradigm of normal science becomes unclear; and (2) this paradigm fails to support normal problem solving research, and scientists begin to use it as if it were merely definitional. After examining the elementary particles paradigm in the light of these two criteria, I conclude that high energy physics is moving from “normal science” to “extraordinary science.” I argue neither that a new paradigm has been found, nor that a return to normal science is imminent; instead I attempt to briefly outline some of the conceptual problems in high energy physics to which Heisenberg, Feynman, and others have alluded, but which so far have not been spelled out in any great philosophical detail. No attempt is made to argue about what the specific consequences of these difficulties might be, but merely to begin to clarify the problems facing scientists dealing with elementary particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 409 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Neal Grossman, Noretta Koertge, Edward MacKinnon, William Schuyler, and especially to Paul Teller, for their perceptive comments and constructive criticisms of an earlier version of this paper. The anonymous referees from Philosophy of Science have also provided a number of helpful suggestions for improvement of this paper, for which I am grateful.

References

[1] Abarbanel, H. D. “Diffraction Scattering of Hadrons: the Theoretical Outlook.” Review of Modern Physics 48 (1976): 435–465.10.1103/RevModPhys.48.435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Abarbanel, H. D., Bronzan, J. B., Sugar, R. L., and White, A. R. Physics Reports 21C (1975): 120–182.10.1016/0370-1573(75)90034-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Abrams, G. S., Alam, M. S., Peruzzi, L., et al. “Observation of a Narrow Charged State at 1876 MeV/c2 Decaying to an Exotic Combination of Kππ.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 569–571.Google Scholar
[4] Akerlof, C. W., Alley, P., Bintinger, D., et al. “Limits on Charmed Particle Production in Proton-Nucleus Collisions at 400 GeV/c.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 732–735.Google Scholar
[5] Alpert, D., Bowers, R., Bromley, D., et al. (eds.). Physics in Perspective, Vol. 1. Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 1972.Google Scholar
[6] Antoniou, N. G., Kourist, N. G., and Papaioannon, G. M. “Multiparticle Production and the Nature of the Pomeron.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 264–272.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Armstrong, B., Barbaro-Galtieri, A., Barash-Schmit, N., et al. “Review of Particle Properties.” Review of Modern Physics 48 (1976): S1–S248.Google Scholar
[8] Aubrecht, G. J., Takasugi, E., and Tanaka, K. “Dimuon Production in a Quark Parton Model.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 728–731.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Audi, Michael. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[10] Aurenche, J. P. and Paton, J. E. “High-Energy Hadron Collisions: A Point of View.” Reports on Progress in Physics 39 (1976): 175–216.10.1088/0034-4885/39/2/002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Avre, C. A., Gustafson, H. R., and Jones, L. W. “Search for New Massive Long-Lived Neutral Particles.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 474–477.Google Scholar
[12] Barger, V. and Phillips, R. J. N. “Weak Semileptonic Decay Distributions for New Particles.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 80–92.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Barut, A. O. The Theory of the Scattering Matrix. New York: Macmillan, 1967.Google Scholar
[14] Barut, A. O. and Brittin, W. E. (eds.). Topics in Strong Interactions. Boulder: Colorado Associated Universities Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[15] Bertocchi, L. “Multiparticle Production on Nuclei—Theory.” in High-Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure—1975: AIP Conference Proceedings. Edited by Nagle, D. E., Goldhaber, A. S., Hargrove, C. K., Burman, R. L., and Storms, B. G. New York: American Institute of Physics, 1975. Pages 238–264.Google Scholar
[16] Binkley, M., Gaines, I., Peoples, J., et al. “Dimuon Production in the ρ. J and Continuum Regions.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 574–578.10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Binkley, M., Gaines, I., Peoples, J., et al. “Limit on Production of Charmed Particles in Association with the J.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 578–581.10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Block, C., Cinro, N. and Harar, S. “Excitation of Simple Particle-Hole Configurations in the Residual Nucleus.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 10 (1969): 77–115.Google Scholar
[19] Boas, M. “Structure of Matter and Chemical Theory in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In Critical Problems in the History of Science. Edited by Clagett, M. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1959.Google Scholar
[20] Borchardt, S., Mathur, V. S., and Okubo, S. “Possible Explanation of the New Resonance in e+e– Annihilation.” Physical Review Letters 34 (1975): 38–40.10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Borchardt, S., Mathur, V. S., and Okubo, S. “SU(4) Symmetry and the Possible Existence of New Hadrons.” Physical Review Letters 34 (1975): 236–239.Google Scholar
[22] Brabson, B. B. “Exotics, Baryon Exchange, and Charm.” In Particles and Fields: AIP Conference Proceedings. Edited by Carlson, C. E. New York: American Institute of Physics, 1975. Pages 314–331.Google Scholar
[23] Brodsky, S. J., and Drell, S. D. “The Present Status of Quantum Electrodynamics.” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 20 (1970): 147–194.10.1146/annurev.ns.20.120170.001051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Carruthers, P. and Zachariasen, F. “Transport Equation Approach to Multiparticle Production Processes.” In [22], pp. 481–498.Google Scholar
[25] Charpak, G. “Evolution of the Automatic Spark Chambers.” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 20 (1970): 195–254.10.1146/annurev.ns.20.120170.001211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Chew, Geoffrey F. “Hadron Bootstrap: Triumph or Frustration?” Physics Today 23 (1970): 23–28.10.1063/1.3021778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Chew, G. F. “Multiperipheralism and the Bootstrap.” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 2 (1968): 163–168.Google Scholar
[28] Chew, G. F. “Nuclear and Particle Physics: Two Different Subjects?” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 2 (1968): 107–110.Google Scholar
[29] Chew, G. F. and Frautschi, S. C. “Regge Poles in π-π Scattering.” Physical Review 126 (1962): 1202–1208.10.1103/PhysRev.126.1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Chew, G. F. and Jacob, M. Strong-Interaction Physics. New York: Benjamin, 1964.Google Scholar
[31] Chew, G. F. and Pignotti, A. “Multiperipheral Bootstrap Model.” Physical Review 176 (1968): 2112–2119.10.1103/PhysRev.176.2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Chiu, C. B. “Evidence for Regge Poles and Hadron Collision Phenomena.” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 22 (1972): 255–316.10.1146/annurev.ns.22.120172.001351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33] Chupka, W., Stevens, C. M., and Schiffer, J. P. “Search for Fractionally Charged Particles in Lunar Soil.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 716–727.Google Scholar
[34] Cleymans, J. and Rodenberg, R. “Quark-Patron Fragmentation Functions.” Physical Review D 9 (1974): 155–158.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Cline, D. B., Mann, A. K. and Rubbia, C. “The Search for New Families of Elementary Particles,” Scientific American 234 (1976): 44–54.10.1038/scientificamerican0176-44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36] Colodny, R. G. (ed.). Paradigms and Paradoxes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[37] Dampier, W. C. A History of Science. New York: Macmillan, 1943.Google Scholar
[38] Davis, D. H. and Sacton, J. “Hypernuclear Physics.” In High-Energy Physics, 2. Edited by Burhop, E. New York: Academic, 1967.Google Scholar
[39] Davis, H. L. “Dimuons at Fermilab Suggest New Form of Hadronic Matter.” Physics Today 29 (1976): 17–20.Google Scholar
[40] Davis, H. L. “Colliding-Beam Data Offer Evidence for Charmed Particle.” Physics Today 29 (1976): 17–20.Google Scholar
[41] Derrick, M. “The Bubble-Chamber Technique: Recent Developments and Some Possibilities for the Future.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 11 (1970): 223–269.Google Scholar
[42] Eden, R. J., Landshoff, P. V., Olive, D. I. and Polkinghorne, J. C. The Analytic S-Matrix. Cambridge: University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[43] Ellis, S. D. and Kislinger, M. B. “Implication of Parton-Model Concepts for Large-Transverse-Momentum Production of Hadrons.” Physical Review D 9 (1974): 2027–2051.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[44] Emmerson, J. M. Symmetry Principles in Particle Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[45] Ericson, T. “Conference Summary.” In [15], pp. 702–712.Google Scholar
[46] Fairchild, E. E. “Gauge Theory of Gravitation.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 384–391.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[47] Feinberg, G. “Philosophical Implications of Contemporary Particle Physics.” In [36], Pages 33–46.Google Scholar
[48] Feld, B. T. Models of Elementary Particles. London: Blaisdell, 1969.Google Scholar
[49] Feyerabend, P. K. “Problems of Microphysics.” Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Edited by Colodny, R. G. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962. Pages 189–253.Google Scholar
[50] Feynman, R. “Structure of the Proton.” Science 183 (1974): 601–610.10.1126/science.183.4125.601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[51] Ford, Kenneth W. The World of Elementary Particles. New York: Blaisdell, 1963.Google Scholar
[52] Frampton, P. H. Dual Resonance Models. Reading: W. A. Benjamin, 1974.Google Scholar
[53] Frauenfelder, H. and Henley, E. M. Nuclear and Particle Physics. London: W. A. Benjamin, 1975.Google Scholar
[54] Frauenfelder, H. “Nuclear Structure: Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions in Nuclei.” In [15], pp. 448–453.Google Scholar
[55] Frautschi, Steven. Regge Poles and S-Matrix Theory. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1963.Google Scholar
[56] Frisch, David H. and Thorndike, Alan M. Elementary Particles. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1964.Google Scholar
[57] Gaillard, M. K., Lee, B. and Rosner, J. R. “Search for Charm.” Review of Modern Physics 47 (1975): 277–310.10.1103/RevModPhys.47.277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[58] Galik, R., Jordan, C., Richter, B., Seppi, E., Siemann, R. and Ecklund, S. “Search for Fractionally-Charged Particles Photoproduced from Copper.” Physical Review D (1974): 1856–1863.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[59] Garwin, R. L., and Lederman, L. M. “Observations of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: the Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon.” Physical Review 105 (1957): 1415–1417.10.1103/PhysRev.105.1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[60] Gatto, R. and Preparata, G. “Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Production of μ Pairs in pp Collisions in the Massive Quark Model.” Physical Review D 9 (1974): 2104–2111.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[61] Georgi, H. “The State of the Art—Guage Theories.” In [22], pp. 575–582.Google Scholar
[62] Georgi, H. and Glashow, S. L. “Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces.” Physical Review Letters 32 (1974): 438–441.10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[63] Georgi, H., De Rujula, A. and Glashow, S. L. “Is Charm Found?” Physical Review Letters 39 (1976): 398–401.Google Scholar
[64] Gell-Mann, M. and Ne'eman, Y. The Eightfold Way. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1964.Google Scholar
[65] Giacomelli, G. “Total Cross-Section Measurements.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 12 (1970): 77–225.Google Scholar
[66] Gibson, W. M. and Pollard, B. R. Symmetry Principles in Elementary Particle Physics. Cambridge: University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[67] Gilman, F. J. “The New Particles.” in [15], pp. 331–350.Google Scholar
[68] Glashow, S. L. “Quarks With Color and Flavor.” Scientific American 233 (1975): 38–50.10.1038/scientificamerican1075-38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[69] Glashow, S. L., Rujula, A. D. and Shankar, R. “Question of Parity Violation in e+e– Annihilation.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 752–754.Google Scholar
[70] Goudsmit, S. A. “Fifty Years of Spin.” Physics Today 29 (1976): 40–43.10.1063/1.3023518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[71] Greenberg, O. W. “e+e– Reactions—Theory.” In [22], pp. 409–436.Google Scholar
[72] Hamilton, W. D. “Parity Violation in Electromagnetic and Strong Interaction Processes.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 10 (1969): 1–75.Google Scholar
[73] Hanson, N. R. The Concept of the Positron. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.10.1063/1.3050673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[74] Hanson, N. R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[75] Heisenberg, W. “The Nature of Elementary Particles.” Physics Today 29 (1976): 32–39.10.1063/1.3023367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[76] Herczeg, P. “Implications of Parity-Violating Effects in Strangeness-Conserving Nonleptonic Processes.” In [15], pp. 504–514.Google Scholar
[77] Hesse, Mary. “On What There Is In Physics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (1962): 234–244.10.1093/bjps/XIII.51.234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[78] Hill, R. D. Tracking Down Particles. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1963.Google Scholar
[79] Hughes, Y. W. “Muons: Munoic Atoms and Muonium.” In [15], pp. 515–540.Google Scholar
[80] Jammer, M. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
[81] Johnson, P. W. and Warnock, R. L. “Dynamical Equations for Regge Theory with Unitarity and Crossing.” In [22], pp. 572–574.Google Scholar
[82] Kallén, G. Elementary Particle Physics. London: Addison-Wesley, 1964.Google Scholar
[83] Kasha, H. “Is Quark the Quarry?” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 4 (1970): 135–319.Google Scholar
[84] Kim, B. R. “Possible Test of the Lepton Number as the Fourth Color.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 781–787.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[85] Kogut, J. “Probems and Progress in Constituent Theories of Hadrons.” In [22] pp. 456–480.Google Scholar
[86] Kokkedee, J. The Quark Model. New York: Benjamin, 1969.Google Scholar
[87] Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[88] Kurşunoglu, B. “A New Symmetry Group for Elementary Particles.” In Symmetry Principles at High Energy. Edited by Kurşunoğlu, and Perlmutter, A. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1964.Google Scholar
[89] Lakatos, I. and Musgrove, A. (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: University Press, 1970.10.1017/CBO9781139171434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[90] Lakatos, I. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In [89], pp. 91–196.10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[91] Landau, L. D. “Fundamental Problems.” In Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century. Edited by Fierz, M. and Weiskopf, V. F. London: Interscience, 1960.Google Scholar
[92] Lederman, L. “Hunting of the Quark.” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 1 (1967): 155–159.Google Scholar
[93] Lederman, L. M. “New Revolution in Particle Detection.” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 3 (1969): 101–106.Google Scholar
[94] Lee, H. “How to Generate the Pomeranchukon from the Background in a Dual Multiperipheral Model.” Physical Review Letters 30 (1973): 719–722.10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[95] Lee, T. D. and Yang, C. N. “Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions.” Physical Review 104 (1956): 254–258.10.1103/PhysRev.104.254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[96] Lichtenberg, D. B. Unitary Symmetry and Elementary Particles. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[97] Lorre, K. and Eichten, E. “Charm Threshold in Electron-Position Annihilation.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 477–480.Google Scholar
[98] Low, F. E. Symmetries and Elementary Partiqles. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1967.Google Scholar
[99] Lubkin, G. “Colliding-Beam Results Upset Quark Advocates.” Physics Today 27 (1974): 17, 20.Google Scholar
[100] Martin, A. D. and Spearman, T. D. Elementary Particle Theory. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1970.Google Scholar
[101] Masterman, M. “The Nature of a Paradigm.” In [89], pp. 59–90.10.1017/CBO9781139171434.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[102] Maxwell, Grover. “The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Edited by Feigl, and Maxwell, . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[103] Melosh, H. “Quarks: Currents and Constituents.” Physical Review D 9 (1974): 1095–1112.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[104] Mohapatra, R. N. “C-P Violation in Gauge Theories.” In [22], pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
[105] Morpurgo, G. “A Short Guide to the Quark Model.” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 20 (1970): 105–146.10.1146/annurev.ns.20.120170.000541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[106] Nambu, Y. “The Confinement of Quarks.” Scientific American 235 (1976): 48–60.10.1038/scientificamerican1176-48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[107] Nash, T. and Yamanouchi, T. “Search for Fractionally-Charged Quarks Produced by 200-and-300 GeV Proton-Nuclear Interactions.” Physical Review Letters 32 (1974): 858–862.10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[108] Ne'eman, Y. “Internal Symmetries.” In Symmetry Principles at High Energy. Edited by Kurşunoğlu, B. and Perlmutter, A. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1964.Google Scholar
[109] Newton, J. O. “Nuclear Spectroscopy with Heavy Ions.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 11 (1970): 53–144.Google Scholar
[110] Noren, Stephen J. “The Picturability of Micro-Entities.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 234–241.10.1086/288518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[111] Novik, I. B. “Visualizability and Models in the Theory of Elementary Particles.” In Philosophical Problems of Elementary Particle Physics. Edited by Kuznetsov, I. V. and Omel'yanovski, M. E. New York: Daniel Davey, 1965.Google Scholar
[112] Novozhilov, Y. V. Elementary Particles. Delhi: Hindustan, 1961.Google Scholar
[113] Noyes, H. P. “Physical Information Needed to Solve the Three-Nucleon Problem.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 10 (1969): 357–380.Google Scholar
[114] O'Donnell, P. J. and Ong, C. L. “Van Royen-Weisskopf Quark Model and the New Particle.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 220–222.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[115] Okubo, S. and Borchardt, S. “SU(4) Symmetry and the New Resonances.” Physical Review D 11 (1975): 2572–2582.Google Scholar
[116] Omel'ionovskii, M. E. “On the Concepts of Elementary and Complex in Microphysics.” Soviet Studies in Philosophy 4 (1966): 3–14.10.2753/RSP1061-196704043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[117] Ono, S. “Electromagnetic Mass Differences and Decay Rates of Charmed Mesons in the Charmed-Quark Model.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 655–657.10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[118] Pandita, P. N. and Singh, Y. “Hadron Production in Photon-Photon Collisions.” Physical Review D 14 (1976): 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[119] Parashar, D. and Dobson, P. “Some Rare Meson-Decay Modes in a Relativistic Quark Model.” Physical Review D (1974): 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[120] Pati, J. B. “The Unity of Baryons and Leptons.” In [22], pp. 604–622.Google Scholar
[121] Paul, A. M. “Hanson on the Unpicturability of Micro-Entities.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (1971): 50–53.10.1093/bjps/22.1.50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[122] Peierls, R. F. and Treiman, S. B. “Pionic Nuclei.” Physical Review Letters 8 (1962): 339–341.10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[123] Pilkuhn, H. The Interactions of Hadrons. New York: John Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
[124] Price, P. B., Shirk, E. K., Osborne, W. Z. and Pinsky, L. S. “Evidence for the Detection of a Moving Magnetic Monopole.” Physical Review Letters 35 (1975): 487–490.10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[125] Raymond, P. “Of Strings, Shells, and Bags.” In [22], pp. 437–455.Google Scholar
[126] Sanda, A. “Massive Quarks and the Quark-Parton Model.” Physical Review D 9 (1974): 1785–1789.10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[127] Shapere, D. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” The Philosophical Review 73 (1964): 383–394.10.2307/2183664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[128] Simmons, J. “Some Topics Concerning N-N and N-D Experiments at Medium Energy.” In [15], pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
[129] Sirlin, A. “Radiative Corrections to Weak Interactions.” In [22] pp. 114–126.Google Scholar
[130] Soloviev, V. G. “Ground and Excited States of Deformed Nuclei.” Progress in Nuclear and Particle Physics 10 (1969): 239–271.Google Scholar
[131] Smith, C. S. “The Development of Ideas on the Structure of Metals.” In Critical Problems in the History of Science. Edited by Clagett, M. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1959.Google Scholar
[132] Sucher, J. “Is the Higgs-Kibble Mechanism Necessary for Unified Gauge Theories?” In [22], pp. 142–157.Google Scholar
[133] Swartz, C. E. “An Article About a Particle with Charm?” The Physics Teacher 13 (1975): 48–49.10.1119/1.2339064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[134] Swartz, C. E. The Fundamental Particles. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[135] Tauscher, L. “Hadronic Atoms.” In [15], pp. 541–562.Google Scholar
[136] Taylor, J. C. Gauge Theories of Weak Interactions. Cambridge: University Press, 1976.10.1063/1.3024523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[137] Thewlis, J. Concise Dictionary of Physics. New York: Pergamon, 1973.Google Scholar
[138] Treiman, S., Feynman, R., Jackson, J., Lee, T. and Low, F. “Panel Discussion.” In AIP Conference Proceedings: Particle Physics. Edited by Bander, M., Shaw, G. and Wong, D. New York: American Institute of Physics, 1972.Google Scholar
[139] Van Hove, L. “Quarks as Additive Constituents of Mesons and Baryons.” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 1 (1967): 8–12.Google Scholar
[140] Veda, Y. “Broken SU(4) Symmetry and the New Resonances.” Physical Review D 14 (August 1976): 788–793.10.1103/PhysRevD.14.788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[141] Veneziano, G. “Origin and Intercept of the Pomeranchuk Singularity.” Physics Letters 43B (1973): 413–416.10.1016/0370-2693(73)90387-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[142] Watkins, J. “Against Normal Science.” In [89], pp. 25–38.10.1017/CBO9781139171434.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[143] Weinberg, S. “Gauge Theories of CP Nonconservation.” Physical Review Letters 37 (1976): 657–661.10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[144] Weinberg, S. Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
[145] Weinberg, S. “Precise Relations Between the Spectra of Vector and Axial-Vector Mesons,” Physical Review Letters 18 (1967): 507–509.10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[146] Weinberg, S. “Unified Theories of Elementary Particle Interaction.” Scientific American 231 (1974): 50–59.10.1038/scientificamerican0774-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[147] Weisskopf, V. “Quantum Theory and Elementary Particles.” High-Energy Physics, 1. Edited by Burhop, E. H. S. New York: Academic, 1967.Google Scholar
[148] Wightman, A. S. “Remarks on the Present State of Affairs in the Quantum Theory of Elementary Particles.” In Mathematical Theory of Elementary Particles. Edited by Goodman, R. and Segal, I. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[149] Wilson, R. “The Excited States of the Proton.” Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 1 (1967): 128–131.Google Scholar
[150] Wolfenstein, L. “Phenomenology of Neutral Currents.” In [22] pp. 84–113.Google Scholar
[151] Wu, C. S. “Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay.” Physical Review 105 (1957): 1413–1415.10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[152] Zachariasen, F. “Self-Consistent Models of the Pomeron.” In [22] pp. 532–550.Google Scholar