Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:55:37.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Ecology and the Logic of Case Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Kristin Shrader-Frechette  and
Earl D. McCoy
Kristin Shrader-Frechette*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of South Florida at Tampa
Earl D. McCoy*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology University of South Florida at Tampa
*
‡Send reprint requests to Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida at Tampa, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CPR 107, Tampa, FL 33620-5550, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Because of the problems associated with ecological concepts, generalizations, and proposed general theories, applied ecology may require a new “logic” of explanation characterized neither by the traditional accounts of confirmation nor by the logic of discovery. Building on the works of Grünbaum, Kuhn, and Wittgenstein, we use detailed descriptions from research on conserving the Northern Spotted Owl, a case typical of problem solving in applied ecology, to (1) characterize the method of case studies; (2) survey its strengths; (3) summarize and respond to its shortcomings; and (4) investigate and defend its underlying “logic”.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 228 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We are grateful to Greg Cooper, Reed Noss, Michael Ruse, and Dan Simberloff for criticisms of earlier drafts and to the National Science Foundation for grants BBS-86-159533 and DIR-91-12445, which supported work on this essay. Remaining errors are our responsibility.

References

Ackermann, R. (1988), Wittgenstein's City. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Adelman, H. (1974), “Rational Explanation Reconsidered: Case Studies and the Hempel-Dray Model”, History and Theory 13: 208–224.10.2307/2504777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. (1986), “Following Wittgenstein”, in Canfield, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, vol. 10. New York: Garland, pp. 223–263.Google Scholar
Baker, G. and Hacker, P. (1985), Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. and Hacker, P. (1986), “Critical Study: On Misunderstanding Wittgenstein: Kripke's Private Language Argument”, in Canfield, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, vol. 10. New York: Garland, pp. 321–364.Google Scholar
Bambrough, J. R. (1979), Moral Scepticism and Moral Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Beckman, T. A. (1971), “On the Use of Historical Examples in Agassi's ‘Sensationalism’”, Studies in History and the Philosophy of Science 1: 293–296.10.1016/0039-3681(71)90010-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, A. R.; Kolsds, J.; Peters, R. H.; and Pickett, S. T. (1989), “How Far in Space and Time Can the Results from a Single Long-Term Study Be Extrapolated?”, in Likens, G. E. (ed.), Long Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 192–198.10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, C. and Woodward, B. (1974), All the President's Men. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1983), Wittgenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17273-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. and Bok, S. (1980), The Teaching of Ethics in Higher Education: A Report. New York: The Hastings Center.10.1007/978-1-4613-3138-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1969), “Reforms as Experiments”, American Psychologist 24: 409–429.10.1037/h0027982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975), “Degrees of Freedom and the Case Study”, Comparative Political Studies 8: 178–193.10.1177/001041407500800204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1984), “Forward”, in R. K. Yin, Case Study Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
Carson, R. A. (1986), “Case Method”, Journal of Medical Ethics 12: 36–37.10.1136/jme.12.1.36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cartwright, N. (1989), “Capacities and Abstractions”, in P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Vol. 13, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 349–356.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979), Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1983), “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis”, in Johnson, R. F. (ed.), Current Ornithology, vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159–187.10.1007/978-1-4615-6781-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, E. (1979), “The Case as Artifact”, Man and Medicine 4: 15–17.Google Scholar
Dawson, W. R.; Ligon, J. D.; Murphy, J. R.; Myers, J. P.; Simberloff, D.; and Verner, J. (1987), “Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel on the Spotted Owl”, The Condor 89: 205–229.10.2307/1368783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, P. (1986), “The Discovery of Excellence”, Journal of Business Ethics 5: 193–201.10.1007/BF00383625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. and Case, T. J. (eds.) (1986), Community Ecology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dilman, I. (1973), Induction and Deduction: A Study in Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edelson, M. (1988), Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. (1985), Unfinished Synthesis, Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eldridge, R. (1987), “Hypotheses, Criterial Claims, and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein's ‘Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough‘”, Philosophical Investigations 10: 226–245.10.1111/j.1467-9205.1987.tb00216.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, K. (1989), Fragile Majesty. Seattle: The Mountaineers.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. (1974a), “A Single Case Propensity Theory of Explanation”, Synthese 28: 171–198.10.1007/BF00485234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. (1974b), “Statistical Probabilities: Single-Case Propensities versus Long-Run Frequencies”, in Leinfellner, W. and Kohler, E. (eds.), Development in the Methodology of Social Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 387–397.10.1007/978-94-010-2259-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. (1975), “On the Historical Explanation of Unique Events”, Theory and Decision 6: 87–97.10.1007/BF00139822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francoeur, R. T. (1984), “A Structured Approach to Teaching Decision-Making Skills in Biomedical Ethics”, Journal of Bioethics 5: 145–154.10.1007/BF01104003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969), The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1987), “Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 127–143.Google Scholar
Gini, A. R. (1985), “The Case Method”, Journal of Business Ethics 4: 351–352.10.1007/BF00381777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, C. (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gorovitz, S. and MacIntyre, A. (1976), “Toward a Theory of Medical Fallibility”, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1: 51–71.10.1093/jmp/1.1.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1981), The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1984), The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1988), “The Role of the Case Study: Method in the Foundation of Psychoanalysis”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18: 623–658.10.1080/00455091.1988.10717195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1981), Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, J. R. and Carey, A. B. (eds.), (1985), “Ecology and Management of the Spotted Owl in the Pacific Northwest”, US Forest Service, General Technical Report 185.10.2737/PNW-GTR-185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutting, G. (1982), “Can Philosophical Beliefs be Rationally Justified?”, American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 315–330.Google Scholar
Hoering, W. (1980), “On Judging Rationality”, Studies in History and the Philosophy of Science 11: 123–136.10.1016/0039-3681(80)90018-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1974), The Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hull, D. (1976), “Are Species Really Individuals?”, Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.10.2307/2412744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1978), “A Matter of Individuality”, Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.10.1086/288811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P. (1989), “Scientific Explanation: The Causes, Some of the Causes, and Nothing But the Causes”, in P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Vol. 13, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 283–306.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. (1991), The Chances of Explanation: Causal Explanation in the Social, Medical, and Physical Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. (1964), The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Kidder, T. (1981), The Soul of a New Machine. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kiester, A. (1982), “Natural Kinds, Natural History, and Ecology”, in Saarinen, E. (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Ecology. Boston: Reidel, pp. 345–356.10.1007/978-94-009-7796-9_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1985a), Species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1985b), “Two Approaches to Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy 82: 632–639.10.2307/2026419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1982), “Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language”, in Black, I. (ed.), Perspective on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 239–296.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1977), Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1968), Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691209418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942), Systematics and the Origin of Species: From the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963), Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674865327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity. Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1987), “The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 145–166.Google Scholar
McCoy, E. D.; Mushinsky, H. R.; and Wilson, D. S. (1993), “Pattern in the Compass Orientation of Gopher Tortoise Burrows at Different Spatial Scales”, Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 3.10.2307/2997457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, A. F. (1986), The Fisherman's Problem: Ecology and Law in the California Fisheries. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1983), “Subjectivity in Psychoanalytic Inference”, in Earman, J. (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 349–411.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. (1988), Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. (1986), “Vampire Bat Control in Latin America”, in Orians, et al. (eds.), Orians et al. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Mowry, B. (1985), “From Galen's Theory to William Harvey's Theory: A Case Study in the Rationality of Scientific Theory Change”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 49–82.10.1016/0039-3681(85)90007-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. (1986), Objectivity, Empiricism, and Truth. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Norse, E. A. (1990), Ancient Forests of the Pacific Northwest. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Olding, A. (1978), “A Defence of Evolutionary Laws”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29: 131–143.10.1093/bjps/29.2.131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orians, G. H., Chair, Committee on the Applications of Ecological Theory to Environmental Problems. (1986), Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Problem Solving: Concepts and Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G. G. (1989), “Are Currently Available Statistical Methods Adequate for Long-Term Studies?”, in Likens, G. E. (ed.), Long Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 199–200.10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. (1986), “Reply”, in Canfield, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York: Garland, pp. 274–297.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1991), A Critique of Ecology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Picardi, E. (1988), “Meaning and Rules”, in Nyiri, J. and Smith, B. (eds.), Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm, pp. 90–121.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1974), The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1959), The Study of Man. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1964), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1965), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1063/1.3059791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985), The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1971), “Narrative Explanation and the Theory of Evolution”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1: 59–74.10.1080/00455091.1971.10716008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (ed.), (1989), What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-1169-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1989), “Four Decades of Scientific Explanations”, in P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Vol. 13, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 384–409.Google Scholar
Salwasser, H. (1986), “Conserving a Regional Spotted Owl Population”, in Orians, et al. (eds.), Orians et al. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 227–247.Google Scholar
Sattler, R. (1986), Biophilosophy: Analytic and Holistic Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-71141-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (1972), “Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences”, Sciences 178: 389–391.10.1126/science.178.4059.389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1985), Science Policy, Ethics, and Economic Methodology: Some Problems of Technology Assessment and Environmental: Impact Analysis. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991), Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520320789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. and McCoy, E. D. (1993), Method in Ecology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511623394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1976), “Experimental Zoogeography of Islands: Effects of Island Size”, Ecology 57: 629–648.10.2307/1936179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Abele, L. G. (1976), “Island Biogeography Theory and Conservation Practice”, Science 191: 285–286.10.1126/science.191.4224.285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, G. G. (1961), The Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/simp92414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1964), This View of Life: The World of an Evolutionist. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1988), “Knowing How vs. Knowing That”, in Nyiri, J. and Smith, B. (eds.), Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1981), “Revisability, A Priori Truth, and Evaluation”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 68–85.10.1080/00048408112340051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1987), “Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Principle of the Common Cause”, Philosophy of Science 54: 465–469.10.1086/289394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1988), “The Principle of the Common Cause”, in Fetzer, J. (ed.), Probability and Causality: Essays in Honor of W. C. Salmon. Boston: Reidel, pp. 211–228.10.1007/978-94-009-3997-4_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, P. and Sneath, P. (1963), Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stent, G. S. (1978), The Coming of the Golden Age: A View of the End of Progress. Garden City: Natural History.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. W.; Forsman, E. D.; Lint, J. B.; Meslow, E. C.; Moon, B. R.; and Verner, J. (1990), A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl. Portland, OR: USDA, Forest Service; USDI, Bureau of Land Management; USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service; USDI, National Park Service.Google Scholar
US Congress (1990), Report of the Interagency Scientific Committee to Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl, Senate Hearings. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, pp. 101–850.Google Scholar
Van Der Steen, W. and Kamminga, H. (1991), “Laws and Natural History in Biology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 445–467.10.1093/bjps/42.4.445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L. (1976), “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks”, Taxon 25: 233–239.10.2307/1219444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcove, D. S. (1990), “Of Owls and Ancient Forests”, in Norse, E. A. (ed.), Ancient Forests of the Pacific Northwest. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 76–83.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1965), Paradox and Discovery. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969), On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1973), Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1979), “Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough”. Translated by J. Beversluis. In C. Luckhardt (ed.), Wittgenstein. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1984), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar