Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:26:14.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Application of Neurological Studies in an Approach to Some Philosophical Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Richard D. Chessick
Richard D. Chessick*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The so-called “mind-brain” problem affords the greatest opportunity for the cooperation of philosophy and science in the advancement of knowledge. In this paper we will outline pertinent facts already learned about the human mind from neurological disciplines, and, using some hypotheses from outstanding workers in neurobiology, we will relate this material to some important philosophical problems. Our proposal is to examine these problems in the light of knowledge gathered from the scientific disciplines, and we hope to demonstrate how this method may eventually clarify some of the confusion and suggest certain solutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 300 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Abramson, H. (ed.), Problems of Consciousness, Macy Foundation, 1951.Google Scholar
2. Alexander, F., Psychosomatic Medicine, Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
3. Beers, C., A Mind That Found Itself, Doubleday, 1948.Google Scholar
4. Brodal, M., The Hippocampus and the Sense of Smell, Brain (1947), 70, pp. 179.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Cobb, S., Emotions and Clinical Medicine, Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
6. Creed, Denny-Brown, Eccles, Liddel, and Sherrington, , Reflex Activity of the Spinal Cord, Oxford, 1932.10.1097/00005053-193310000-00051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dobbs, H., The Relationship Between the Time of Psychology and the Time of Physics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Nov. 1952), 2, 7, pp. 192.Google Scholar
8. Gerard, R., The Phenomenon of Causalgia, Anesthesiology (Jan. 1951), 12, 1, pp. 10.Google Scholar
9. Gomori, G., and Chessick, R. D., Esterases and Phosphatases of the Brain, Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, In press.Google Scholar
10. Himwich, H., Brain Metabolism in Abnormal Conditions, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases (Nov. 1951), 114, pp. 457.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Jeffress, (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (Hixon Symposium), Wiley, 1952.Google Scholar
12. Lewis, C. I., Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, Open Court, 1946.Google Scholar
13. Nietzsche, F., The Birth of Tragedy, Modern Library, Edition, pp. 1026.Google Scholar
14. Penfield, W., and Rasmussen, T., The Cerebral Cortex of Man, Macmillan, 1951.Google Scholar
15. Pitts, W., and McCulloch, W., How We Know Universals, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics (1947), 9, pp. 127–147.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Russell, B., Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits, Simon and Schuster, 1948.Google Scholar
17. Scharrer, E., and Sinden, J., Contribution to the Chemoarchitectonics of the Optic Tectum of the Pigeon Brain, Journal of Comparative Neurology (Dec. 1949), 91, 3, pp. 331–336.Google Scholar
18. Von Bonin, G., Essay on the Cerebral Cortex, Thomas, 1950.10.1037/13231-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wiener, N., Cybernetics, Wiley, 1948, pp. 56.10.2307/1336399CrossRefGoogle Scholar