Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:57:20.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Mike Dacey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers and psychologists have long worried that the human tendency to anthropomorphize leads us to err in our understanding of nonhuman minds. This tendency, which I call intuitive anthropomorphism, is a heuristic used by our unconscious folk psychology to understand nonhuman animals. The dominant understanding of intuitive anthropomorphism underestimates its complexity. If we want to understand and control intuitive anthropomorphism, we must treat it as a cognitive bias and look to the empirical evidence. This evidence suggests that the most common control for intuitive anthropomorphism, Morgan’s Canon, should be rejected, while others are incomplete. It also suggests new approaches.

Type
Cognitive Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 84 , Issue 5 , December 2017 , pp. 1152 - 1164
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Lauren Olin, John Doris, and Carrie Figdor for reading drafts of the article, to Danny Povinelli and Marta Halina for helpful conversations, and to participants at presentations at Washington University in St. Louis, the University of Nevada, Reno, Colby College, Bates College, and of course the 2016 Philosophy of Science Association meeting in Atlanta.

References

Arico, Adam, Fiala, Brian, Goldberg, Robert F., and Nichols, Shaun. 2011. “The Folk Psychology of Consciousness.” Mind and Language 26 (3): 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Richard R., Eberhardt, Jennifer L., and Ross, Lee. 2006. “Discrimination and Implicit Bias in a Racially Unequal Society.” California Law Review 94 (4): 1169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Justin L., and Keil, Frank C. 1996. “Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts.” Cognitive Psychology 31 (3): 219–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekoff, Marc. 2000. “Animal Emotions: Exploring Passionate Natures.” BioScience 50 (10): 861–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhausen, Galen V., and Wyer, Robert S. 1985. “Effects of Stereotypes in Decision Making and Information-Processing Strategies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (2): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchard, Annegret, Schwappach, David L., Barbir, Aline, and Bezzola, Paula. 2012. “A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Compliance, and Critical Factors for Implementation of Safety Checklists in Surgery.” Annals of Surgery 256 (6): 925–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burghardt, Gordon M. 2007. “Critical Anthropomorphism, Uncritical Anthropocentrism, and Naïve Nominalism.” Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 2:136–38.Google Scholar
Caporael, Linnda R., and Heyes, Cecilia M. 1997. “Why Anthropomorphize? Folk Psychology and Other Stories.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, ed. Mitchell, Robert W., Thompson, Nicholas S., and Miles, H. Lyn, 59–74. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Nilanjana, and Greenwald, Anthony G. 2001. “On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (5): 800–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, Daniel C. 1989. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Frans B. M. 1991. “Complementary Methods and Convergent Evidence in the Study of Primate Social Cognition.” Behaviour 118 (3): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, Frans B. M. 1999. “Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial: Consistency in Our Thinking about Humans and Other Animals.” Philosophical Topics 27 (1): 255–80.Google Scholar
Eddy, Timothy J., Gallup, Gordon G. Jr., and Povinelli, Daniel J. 1993. “Attribution of Cognitive States to Animals: Anthropomorphism in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Social Issues 49 (1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Simon. 2008. “Doing Away with Morgan’s Canon.” Mind and Language 23 (2): 224–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, Gordon G. Jr., Marino, Lori, and Eddy, Timothy J. 1997. “Anthropomorphism and the Evolution of Social Intelligence: A Comparative Approach.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, ed. Mitchell, Robert W., Thompson, Nicholas S., and Miles, H. Lyn, 77–91. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gebhard, Ulrich, Nevers, Patricia, and Billmann-Mahecha, Elfriede. 2003. “Moralizing Trees: Anthropomorphism and Identity in Children’s Relationships to Nature.” In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, ed. Clayton, Susan and Opotow, Susan, 91–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale, and Kahneman, Daniel, eds. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govan, Cassandra L., and Williams, Kipling D. 2004. “Changing the Affective Valence of the Stimulus Items Influences the IAT by Re-defining the Category Labels.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40:357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Alexander R., Carney, Dana R., Pallin, Daniel J., Ngo, Long H., Raymond, Kristal L., Iezzoni, Lisa I., and Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2007. “Implicit Bias among Physicians and Its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (9): 1231–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, Fritz, and Simmel, Marianne. 1944. “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior.” American Journal of Psychology 57 (2): 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, Cecilia M. 2015. “Animal Mindreading: What’s the Problem?” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22 (2): 313–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, David. 1957. The Natural History of Religion. ed. Root, H. E. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, John S. 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legault, Lisa, Gutsell, Jennifer N., and Inzlicht, Michael. 2011. “Ironic Effects of Antiprejudice Messages: How Motivational Interventions Can Reduce (but Also Increase) Prejudice.” Psychological Science 22 (12): 1472–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Jiangang, Li, Jun, Feng, Lu, Li, Ling, Tian, Jie, and Lee, Kang. 2014. “Seeing Jesus in Toast: Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Face Pareidolia.” Cortex 53:60–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, Randall. 1986. “Anthropomorphism Is Not a Four-Letter Word.” In Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1985, ed. Fox, Michael W. and Mickley, Linda D., 185–99. Boston: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Manning, Aubrey, and Dawkins, Marian Stamp. 1998. An Introduction to Animal Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2005. “Anthropomorphism and Cross-Species Modeling.” In Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Gregg, 100–117. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Tara L., Haw, Ryann M., Pfeifer, Jeffrey E., and Meissner, Christian A. 2005. “Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-analytic Review of Defendant Treatment.” Law and Human Behavior 29 (6): 621–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morewedge, Carey K., Preston, Jesse, and Wegner, Daniel M. 2007. “Timescale Bias in the Attribution of Mind.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd. 1894. Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London: Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss-Racusin, Corrinne A., Dovidio, John F., Brescoll, Victoria L., Graham, Mark J., and Handelsman, Jo. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (41): 16474–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. Keith, Lambert, Alan J., and Jacoby, Larry L. 2002. “Best Laid Plans: Effects of Goals on Accessibility Bias and Cognitive Control in Race-Based Misperceptions of Weapons.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (4): 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, Derek C. 2011. “How Folk Psychology Ruined Comparative Psychology: And How Scrub Jays Can Save It.” In Animal Thinking: Contemporary Issues in Comparative Cognition, ed. Menzel, Randolf and Fischer, Julia, 253–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Daniel J. 2012. World without Weight: Perspectives on an Alien Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Johnson, Sheri Lynn, Wistrich, Andrew J., and Guthrie, Chris. 2009. “Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?” Notre Dame Law Review 84 (3): 1195–1246.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Jeffrey Lee, and Rajecki, D. W. 1995. “Differences and Similarities in Humans’ Perceptions of the Thinking and Feeling of a Dog and a Boy.” Society and Animals 3 (2): 117–37.Google Scholar
Rivas, Jesus, and Burghardt, Gordon M. 2002. “Crotalomorphism: A Metaphor for Understanding Anthropomorphism by Omission.” In The Cognitive Animal: Experimental and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, ed. Bekoff, Marc, Allen, Colin, and Burghardt, Gordon M., 9–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seamone, Evan R. 2006. “Understanding the Person beneath the Robe: Practical Methods for Neutralizing Harmful Judicial Biases.” Willamette Law Review 42 (1): 1–76.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, Sarah J. 2010. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 2005. “Comparative Psychology Meets Evolutionary Biology.” In Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Gregg, 85–99. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Brandon D., and Payne, B. Keith. 2008. “Bringing Automatic Stereotyping under Control: Implementation Intentions as Efficient Means of Thought Control.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34:1332–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Rhiannon N., and Crisp, Richard J. 2010. “Imagining Intergroup Contact Reduces Implicit Prejudice.” British Journal of Social Psychology 49:129–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlmann, Eric Luis, and Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2007. “‘I Think It, Therefore It’s True’: Effects of Self-Perceived Objectivity on Hiring Discrimination.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (2): 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Clive D. L. 2007. “What Are Animals? Why Anthropomorphism Is Still Not a Scientific Approach to Behavior.” Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 2:125–35.Google Scholar