Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:42:40.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Benjamin Sheredos ,
Daniel Burnston ,
Adele Abrahamsen  and
William Bechtel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diagrams have distinctive characteristics that make them an effective medium for communicating research findings, but they are even more impressive as tools for scientific reasoning. To explore this role, we examine diagrammatic formats that have been devised by biologists to (a) identify and illuminate phenomena involving circadian rhythms and (b) develop and modify mechanistic explanations of these phenomena.

Type
General Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , December 2013 , pp. 931 - 944
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We gratefully acknowledge the support of National Science Foundation grant 1127640.

References

Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2005. “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:421–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele 2011. “Complex Biological Mechanisms: Cyclic, Oscillatory, and Autonomous.” In Philosophy of Complex Systems: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, ed. Hooker, Clifford A., 257–85. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William, and Richardson, Robert C.. 1993/1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bogen, James, and Woodward, James. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” Philosophical Review 97:303–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Peter C.-H. 2011. “Probably Good Diagrams for Learning: Representational Epistemic Recodification of Probability Theory.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3:475–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, Paul E., Hall, Jeffrey C., and Rosbash, Michael. 1990. “Feedback of the Drosophila Period Gene Product on Circadian Cycling of Its Messenger RNA Levels.” Nature 343:536–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, Mary. 2004. “Mechanical Reasoning by Mental Simulation.” Trends in Cognitive Science 8:280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogenesch, John B., and Ueda, Hiroki R.. 2011. “Understanding Systems-Level Properties: Timely Stories from the Study of Clocks.” Nature Reviews Genetics 12:407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Nicholaos, and Wolkenhauer, Olaf. 2012. “Diagrams as Locality Aids for Explanation and Model Construction in Cell Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 27:705–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F.. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perini, Laura. 2005. “Explanation in Two Dimensions: Diagrams and Biological Explanation.” Biology and Philosophy 20:257–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Barbara. 2011. “Visualizing Thought.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3:499–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukai, Hideki, and Ueda, Hiroki R.. 2010. “Systems Biology of Mammalian Circadian Clocks.” Annual Review of Physiology 72:579–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukai-Tadenuma, Maki, Yamada, Rikuhiro G., Xu, Haiyan, Ripperger, Jürgen A., Liu, Andrew C., and Ueda, Hiroki R.. 2011. “Delay in Feedback Repression by Cryptochrome 1 Is Required for Circadian Clock Function.” Cell 144:268–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Eric E., and Kay, Steve A.. 2010. “Clocks Not Winding Down: Unravelling Circadian Networks.” Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 11:764–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar