Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:12:08.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual Abductive Reasoning in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Cameron Shelley
Cameron Shelley*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of Waterloo
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONT N2L 6E6, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biographical studies have shown that visual mental imagery plays a significant role in the conduct of scientific research, particularly in the generation of hypotheses. But the nature of visual mental imagery and its participation in abductive inference is not systematically understood. This paper discusses examples of visual abductive reasoning by archaeologists, analyzing them according to the visual information and the process of inference employed. This work supports the conclusion that visual abduction is useful to scientists under certain conditions and that it is amenable to detailed study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 278 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Paul Thagard and anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. This research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

Baigrie, B. S. (ed.) (1995), Scientific Illustration: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Interaction between Art and Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bibby, G. (1970), “An Experiment with Time”, Horizon 12(2): 96–101.Google Scholar
Bylander, T., Allemang, D., Tanner, M. C. and Josephson, J. R. (1991). The Computational Complexity of Abduction, Artificial Intelligence 49: 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Console, L., Dupre, D. T. and Torasso, P. (1991), “On the Relationship between Abduction and Deduction”, Journal of Logic and Computation 1(5): 661–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. and Koch, C. (1995), “Are We Aware of Neural Activity in Primary Visual Cortex?”, Nature 375: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. R. (1995), “Knowing How, Knowing Where”, Nature 375: 106–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dart, R. A. (1948), “The Makapansgat Proto-human Australopithecus Prometheus”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 6(3): 259–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dretske, F. I. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Drury, P. J. (1983a), “Form, Function, and the Interpretation of the Excavated Plans of Some Large Secular Romano-British Buildings”, in Drury 1983b, Chapter 14, pp. 289–308.Google Scholar
Drury, P. J. (ed.) (1983b), Structural Reconstruction: Approaches to the Interpretation of the Excavated Remains of Buildings. Number 110 in B.A.R. British Series, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1908), Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, Everyman's Library Series, 2nd edn., New York: E. P. Dutton & Sons Ltd. Reprinted by AMS Press Inc., 1973. First edition printed 1883.Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. (1995), “Visual Models and Scientific Judgment”, in Baigrie 1995. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1981), Mind in Science: A History of Explanations in Psychology and Physics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hampson, P. J., Marks, D. F. and Richardson, J. T. E. (1990), Imagery: Current Developments. International Library of Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. O. (1977), The prehistoric village at Lejre. Lejre: Historisk-arkælogisk Fors⊘gscenter. Translation of Oldtidsbyen ved Lejre 1964–1974, 1974.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1969), Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.) (1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Volumes 7–8 edited by A. Burks.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.) (1982), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (1990), “Imagery Effects on Problem Solving”, in Hampson, et al. 1990, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar
Knecht, H. (1993), “Splits and Wedges: The Techniques and Technology of Early Aurignacian antler working”, in Knecht, et al. 1993, Chapter 10, pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
Knecht, H. (1994), Late Ice Age Hunting Technology, Scientific American 271(1): 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, H., Pike-Tay, A. and White, R. (eds.) (1993), Before Lascaux: The Complex Record of the Early Upper Paleolithic. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Konolige, K. (1990), “Closure + Minimization Implies Abduction”, in Tanaka 1990, pp. 369–374.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994), Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, M. D. (1971), Olduvai Gorge: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960–1963, Vol. 3: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Foreword by J. D. Clark.Google Scholar
Leakey, M. D. (1979), Olduvai Gorge: My Search for Early Man. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Leakey, R. E. and Lewin, R. (1992), Origins Reconsidered: In Search of What Makes Us Human. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Leakey, R. E. and Walker, A. (1985), “Homo Erectus Unearthed”, National Geographic 168: 624–629.Google Scholar
Levesque, H. J. (1989), A Knowledge-Level Account of Abduction, in Sridharan 1989, pp. 1061–1067.Google Scholar
Potts, R. (1988), Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai. Foundations of Human Behavior. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roe, A. (1951), “A Study of Imagery in Research Scientists”, Journal of Personality 19: 459–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roe, A. (1952). The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.Google Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R. (1985), “Visual Thinking: The Art of Imagining Reality”, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 75(6): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, K. D. and Toth, N. (1993). Making Silent Stones Speak: Human Evolution and the Dawn of Technology. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Shelley, C. (1995), “Visual Abduction in Anthropology and Archaeology”, in Valdez-Perez 1995. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sridharan, N. S. (ed.) (1989), Proceedings, 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, MI, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Startin, W. (1978), “Linear pottery culture houses: Reconstruction and manpower”, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 44: 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talalay, L. E. (1987), “Rethinking the Function of Clay Figurine Legs from Neolithic Greece: An Argument by Analogy”, American Journal of Archaeology 91: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H. (ed.) (1990), Proceedings, Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya-shi, Japan. Burke, VA: Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1988), Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. and Shelley, C. (1995), “Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence”, in van Benthem, et al. 1995. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tootell, R. B. H., Reppas, J. B., Dale, A. M., Look, R. B., Sereno, M. I., Malach, R., Brady, T. J. and Rosen, B. R. (1995), “Visual Motion Aftereffect in Human Cortical Area MT Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, Nature 375: 139–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdez-Perez, R. (ed.) (1995), AAAI Spring Symposium on Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Stanford: AAAI.Google Scholar
van Benthem, J. F. A. K., Chiara, M.-L. D., Doets, H. C. and Mundici, D. (eds.) (1995), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science X, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wylie, M. A. (1982), Epistemological Issues Raised by a Structuralist Archaeology, in Hodder 1982, Chapter 4, pp. 39–46.Google Scholar