Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:21:34.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Van Fraassen and Ruetsche on Preparation and Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Bradley Monton*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Department of Philosophy, 1879 Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544–1006; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Ruetsche (1996) has argued that van Fraassen's (1991) Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation (CVMI) gives unsatisfactory accounts of measurement and of state preparation. I defend the CVMI against Ruetsche's first argument by using decoherence to show that the CVMI does not need to account for the measurement scenario which Ruetsche poses. I then show, however, that there is a problem concerning preparation, and the problem is more serious than the one Ruetsche focuses on. The CVMI makes no substantive predictions for the everyday processes we take to be measurements.

Type
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Laura Ruetsche and Bas van Fraassen for helpful discussion. This material is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.

References

Albert, David (1992), Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, Jeffrey (1997), Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, Laura (1996), “Van Fraassen on Preparation and Measurement”, Philosophy of Science 63: S338S346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas. (1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar