Article contents
Abstract
This article argues that quantum observables can include not just self-adjoint operators but any member of the class of normal operators, including those with nonreal eigenvalues. Concrete experiments, statistics, and symmetries are all expressed in this more general context. However, this more general class of observables also requires a new restriction on sets of operators that can be interpreted as observables at once, called ‘sharp sets’.
- Type
- Physical Sciences
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association
Footnotes
†
Thanks to Jeremy Butterfield for many helpful suggestions about these ideas.
References
Albert, D. Z. 1992. Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, J., Exner, P., and Havlíček, M. 2008. Hilbert Space Operators in Quantum Physics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Conway, J. B. 1990. A Course in Functional Analysis. 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 96. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. 1935. The Principles of ‘Quantum’ Mechanics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. J. 1995. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. 1976. “Who Is Afraid of Nonhermitian Operators? A Quantum Description of Angle and Phase.” Annals of Physics 101 (1): 319–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. 2004. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. 2016. “Observables, Disassembled.” Unpublished manuscript, PhilSci Archive. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12478/.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by