Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Theories of intentionality need to account for non-cognitive states like emotions as well as cognitive states like beliefs. When certain non-cognitive states are included, one can formulate a feasible physicalist account of intentionality that highlights its evolutionary roots. I argue that recent experimental data support just such a move.
My thanks to Sara Waller, E. J. Neafsey, the Philosophy Department at Canterbury University in New Zealand, and the participants in the conference on Intentionality at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, for their many helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.