Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:08:31.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Synthetization of the Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Matthew L. Lamb
Matthew L. Lamb*
Affiliation:
Monastery, Conyers, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rapidity with which new sciences are being formed and the older ones are becoming further specialized calls for a complementary effort to interrelate the sciences. A genuine synthetization must be completely open to all future discoveries and developments within science. Such an openness would be possible only if scientific understanding possesses certain invariable patterns according to which the synthetization could be constructed. Lonergan's Insight (New York, 1958) seems to have uncovered these basic and irrevisable patterns. Not only do they demonstrate the complementarity of classical and statistical methods but the isomorphic Emergent Probability operative in world-process may well provide the framework for an open synthetization. In the present essay this possibility is demonstrated by interrelating, according to it, certain generic fields of the scientific endeavor, from physics to cultural anthropology.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 182 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bascom, W.R., and Herskovits, M.J., “The problem of stability and change in African culture,” Continuity and Change in African Cultures, Phoenix Books 85 (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
[2] Bidney, David, Theoretical Anthropology, 3rd printings (N.Y.: Columbia Univ. Press, 1960).Google Scholar
[3] Ellson, D.G., “The scientists’ criterion of true observation,” Philosophy of Science, V. 30, No. 1 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Lonergan, Bernard J.F., Insight, A Study of Human Understanding, 2nd revised edition (N.Y.: Philosophical Library, 1958).Google Scholar
[5] Novak, Michael, “An empirically controlled metaphysics,” International Philosophical Quarterly, V. 4, No. 2 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar