Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:45:00.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a Reassessment of Comte's ‘Méthode Positive‘

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Larry Laudan*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

In this study of Auguste Comte's philosophy of science, an attempt is made to explicate his views on such methodological issues as explanation, prediction, induction and hypothesis. Comte's efforts to resolve the dual problems of demarcation and meaning led to the enunciation of principles of verifiability and predictability. Comte's hypothetico-deductive method is seen to permit conjectures dealing with unobservable entities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bailey, S., Essays on the Pursuit of Truth, London, 1829.Google Scholar
[2] Bernard, C., Introduction à l'Etude de la Médecine Expérimentale, Paris, 1865.Google Scholar
[3] Brewster, D., Review of 1840-edition, volumes I and II of [31], Edinburgh Review, 1842, 482-491.Google Scholar
[4] Comte, A., Cours de Philosophie Positive, 1st edit., 6 vols., Paris, 1830-42.Google Scholar
[5] Comte, A., Géométrie Analytique, Paris, 1843.Google Scholar
[6] Comte, A., System of Positive Polity, 4 vols. (trans. Bridges et alia), London, 1875-77.Google Scholar
[7] Comte, A., Discours sur l'Esprit Positif, Paris, 1844.Google Scholar
[8] Delvolvé, J., Réflexions sur la Pensée Comtienne, Paris, 1932.Google Scholar
[9] Ducassé, P., Méthode et Intuition chez Auguste Comte, Paris, 1939.Google Scholar
[10] Duval-Jouve, J., Traité de Logique, ou Essai sur la Théorie de la Science, Paris, 1844.Google Scholar
[11] Hayek, F., The Counter-Revolution of Science, London, 1955.Google Scholar
[12] Knight, D., Atoms and Elements, London, 1967.Google Scholar
[13] Laudan, L., “The Nature and Sources of Locke's Views on Hypotheses,” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 28, 1967, pp. 211223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Laudan, L., “Thomas Reid and the Newtonian Turn of British Methodological Thought,” in The Methodological Heritage of Newton (ed. R. Butts), Toronto, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Laudan, L., From Testability to Meaning, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[16] Lévy-Bruhl, L., The Philosophy of Auguste Comte (trans. F. Harrison), New York, 1903.Google Scholar
[17] Littré, E., De la Philosophie Positive, Paris, 1845.Google Scholar
[18] Littré, E., Auguste Comte et la Philosophie Positive, 2nd edit., Paris, 1864.Google Scholar
[19] Locke, J., Essay concerning the Human Understanding, London, 1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Martin, B., Philosophical Grammar, Reading, 1748.Google Scholar
[21] Meyerson, E., Identity and Reality (trans. Loewenburg), New York, 1962.Google Scholar
[22] Mill, J. S., A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, 2 vols., London, 1843.Google Scholar
[23] Mill, J. S., Lettres Inédites de John Stuart Mill à Auguste Comte (ed. L. Lévy-Bruhl), Paris, 1899.Google Scholar
[24] Mueller, I., John Stuart Mill and French Thought, Urbana, Ill., 1956.Google Scholar
[25] Peirce, C. S., Collected Papers (ed. P. Weiss et alia), 7 vols., Cambridge, Mass., 1932-58.Google Scholar
[26] Popper, K., Conjectures and Refutations, London, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Popper, K., The Open Society and its Enemies, 2 vols., Princeton, 1963.Google Scholar
[28] Rankine, J., Miscellaneous Scientific Papers, Edinburgh, 1894.Google Scholar
[29] Reid, T., Works (ed. Hamilton), Edinburgh, 1858.Google Scholar
[30] Simon, W., European Positivism in the Nineteenth Century, Ithaca, 1963.Google Scholar
[31] Whewell, W., The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, founded upon their History (eds. Buchdahl & Laudan), 2 vols., London, 1968.Google Scholar
[32] Whewell, W., “Comte and Positivism,” Macmillan's Magazine, vol. 13, 1866, pp. 353362.Google Scholar