Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:16:11.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theo C. Meyering Historical Roots of Cognitive Science: The Rise of a Cognitive Theory of Perception from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Boston: Kluwer (1989), xix + 250 pp. $69.00 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Gary Hatfield
Gary Hatfield*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 662 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alhazen (1572), De aspectibus, in F. Risner (ed.), Opticae thesaurus. Basel: per Episcopios.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1911–1912), Summa theologica, part 1. Translated by the English Dominican Fathers. London: Thomas Baker.Google Scholar
Bacon, R. (1928), Opus majus, vols. 1–2. Translated by R. B. Burke. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.10.9783/9781512814064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, G. (1709), An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision. Dublin: Aaron Rhames.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. (1733), The Theory of Vision or Visual Language, Vindicated and Explained. London: J. Tonson.Google Scholar
Coimbra College (ca. 1600), Commentarii in tres libros de Anima. Cologne: Lazarus Zetznerius.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1984–1985), Philosophical Writings, vols. 1–2. Translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (1961), Sensation and Perception: A History of the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. and Epstein, W. (1979), “The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory”, Isis 70: 363–384.10.1086/352281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmholtz, H. (1925), Handbook of Physiological Optics. Vol. 3, The Perceptions of Vision. Translated by J. P. C. Southall. Rochester: Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1971), Selected Writings. Edited by Kahl, R. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Lejeune, A. (1948), Euclide et Ptolémée: Deux stades de l'optique géométrique grecque. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l'Université.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. C. (1976), Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pastore, N. (1971), Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 1650–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pecham, J. (1970), “Perspectiva communis”, in D. C. Lindberg (ed.), John Pecham and the Science of Optics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 60–242.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969), “Epistemology Naturalized”, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.10.7312/quin92204-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabra, A. I. (1978), “Sensation and Inference in Alhazen's Theory of Perception”, in Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.), Studies in Perception. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 160–185.Google Scholar
Suarez, F. (1856), De anima, in D. M. André (ed.), Opera omnia, vol. 3. Paris: Vivès.Google Scholar
Witelo, (1572), Perspectiva, in F. Risner (ed.), Opticae thesaurus. Basel: per Episcopios.Google Scholar