Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:27:10.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

T. F. H. Allen and Thomas B. Starr, Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1982), xvi + 310 pp. np.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Sahotra Sarkar*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eigen, M. (1977), “The Hypercycle: Principle of Natural Self-Organization”, Naturwissenschaften 64: 541565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. (1982), “The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution”, in Roger Milkman (ed.). Perspectives on Evolution. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. (1967), The Ghost in the Machine. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pattee, H. H. (ed.) (1973), Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1961), “Evolution and the Tree of Knowledge”, The Herbert Spencer Lecture, Oxford. Reprinted in Karl Popper, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarenden Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, G. M. (1975), An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1976), “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in G. G. Globus, G. Maxwell, and I. Savodnik (eds.). Consciousness and the Brain: Scientific and Philosophical Strategies. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1980), “Reductionist Research Strategies and their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in Tom Nickles (ed.). Scientific Discovery, Vol. 2: Historical and Scientific Case Studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar