Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:43:21.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swimming in Evidence: A Reply to Maher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Achinstein
Peter Achinstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Johns Hopkins University
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, 347 Gilman Hall, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218–2690.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 175 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Special thanks are due to Laura J. Snyder for helping me to stay afloat in the sea of evidence, and to Robert Rynasiewicz for trying to sink me.

References

Achinstein, P. (1983), The Nature of Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, P. (1996), “Subjective and Objective Confirmation,” Philosophy of Science 63, 2: 149–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1979), Opticks. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Snyder, L. J. (1994), “Is Evidence Historical?,” in Achinstein, P. and Snyder, L. J. (eds.), Scientific Methods: Conceptual and Historical Problems. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. (1953), Newton's Philosophy of Nature. New York: Hafner Press.Google Scholar