Article contents
Some Comments on Rosenberg's Review
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Extract
I am grateful to Philip Kitcher for inviting me to comment on Alexander Rosenberg's (1996) review of Philosophy of Biology (Sober 1993) and to Rosenberg for his kind words about my book at the very beginning and the very end of his review. However, I cannot help feeling that most of the material in Rosenberg's review describes a different book from the one I wrote. Of the four philosophical claims that he ascribes to me, only one of them is asserted or implied in Philosophy of Biology. Rosenberg is right that I have argued that many evolutionary laws turn out, when stated carefully, to be a priori mathematical truths. However, he is mistaken in thinking that I am a “historicist” who holds that “fundamental theory in biology is narrative.” Rosenberg also misconstrues my views on the meaning of probability statements in evolutionary theory.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1996
Footnotes
Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, 600 North Park Street, Madison, WI 53706.
References
- 2
- Cited by