Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:20:49.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Functional Reference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Andrea Scarantino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theoretical construct of functional reference is the main tool used by animal communication researchers to explore how animals refer to the world in the absence of a language. Functionally referential signals are commonly defined as signals elicited by a specific class of stimuli and capable of causing behaviors adaptive to such stimuli in the absence of contextual cues. I will argue that this definition is conceptually flawed and propose an alternative definition according to which signals can functionally refer to things that rarely cause them while relying on the essential contribution of contextual cues.

Type
General Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , December 2013 , pp. 1006 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I want to thank the audience of my talk at the PSA 2012 meeting in San Diego this past November for helpful questions. I also want to thank the participants to the Proto-Language Workshop organized by Mitch Green and Dorit Bar-On at the University of Virginia in March 2012 for useful feedback on a different version of this article.

References

Allen, C., and Saidel, E.. 1998. “The Evolution of Reference.” In The Evolution of Mind, ed. Cummins, D. and Allen, C., 183–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-On, D., and Green, M.. 2010. “Lionspeak: Communication, Expression, and Meaning.” In Self, Language, and World: Problems from Kant, Sellars, and Rosenberg; in Memory of Jay F. Rosenberg, ed. O’Shea, J. R. and Rubenstein, E. M.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Clay, Z., Smith, C. L., and Blumstein, D. T.. 2012. “Food-Associated Vocalizations in Mammals and Birds: What Do These Calls Really Mean?” Animal Behaviour 83:323–30. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872). http://pages.britishlibrary.net/charles.darwin/.Google Scholar
Evans, C. S. 1997. “Referential Signals.” In Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 12, Communication, ed. Owings, D. H., Beecher, M. D., and Thompson, N. S., 88–143. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1991. “Signal, Decision, Action.” Journal of Philosophy 88:709–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Macedonia, J. M., and Evans, C. S.. 1993. “Variation among Mammalian Alarm Call Systems and the Problem of Meaning in Animal Signals.” Ethology 93:177–97.Google Scholar
Marler, P., Evans, C. S., and Hauser, M. D.. 1992. “Animal Signals: Motivational, Referential, or Both?” In Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Comparative and Developmental Approaches, ed. Papousek, H., Jürgens, U., and Papousek, M., 66–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 2004. Varieties of Meaning: The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7072.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendall, D., Owren, M. J., and Ryan, M.. 2009. “What Do Animal Signals Mean?” Animal Behaviour 78:233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarantino, A. 2010. “Animal Communication between Information and Influence.” Animal Behaviour 30:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarantino, A. 2013. “A Probabilistic Theory of Natural Information.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Philosophy and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Searcy, W., and Nowicki, S.. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L.. 1986. “Vocal Development in Vervet Monkeys.” Animal Behaviour 34:1640–58.10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80252-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L. 2003. “Signalers and Receivers in Animal Communication.” Annual Review of Psychology 54:145–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., and Marler, P.. 1980. “Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication.” Science 210:801–3.10.1126/science.7433999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, N. 2007. “Consumers Need Information: Supplementing Teleosemantics with an Input Condition.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2): 404–35..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struhsaker, T. T. 1967. “Auditory Communication among Vervet Monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops).” In Social Communication among Primates, ed. Altmann, S. A., 281–324. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, S., and Manser, M.. 2013. “Functionally Referential Communication in Mammals: The Past, Present and the Future.” Ethology 119:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, B. C., and Fischer, J.. 2012. “Functionally Referential Signals: A Promising Paradigm Whose Time Has Passed.” Evolutionary Anthropology 21:195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuberbühler, K. 2005. “The Phylogenetic Roots of Language: Evidence from Primate Communication and Cognition.” Psychological Science 14:126–30.Google Scholar