Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:22:32.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to George: Thomas Reid and the Constancy Hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Nicholas Pastore
Nicholas Pastore*
Affiliation:
Queens College of the City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 297 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

George, R. A. “Review: Nicholas Pastore. Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 1650–1950.” Philosophy of Science 41 (1974): 296–297.10.1086/288593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastore, N. Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 1650–1950. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Reid, T. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Introduction by A, B. Brody, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Reid, T. Inquiry into the Human Mind. In Works of Thomas Reid. New York: Duyckinck, 1822.Google Scholar