Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:27:40.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Predictive Turn in Neuroscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2022

Daniel A. Weiskopf*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA

Abstract

Neuroscientists have in recent years turned to building models that aim to generate predictions rather than explanations. This “predictive turn” has swept across domains including law, marketing, and neuropsychiatry. Yet the norms of prediction remain undertheorized relative to those of explanation. I examine two styles of predictive modeling and show how they exemplify the normative dynamics at work in prediction. I propose an account of how predictive models, conceived of as technological devices for aiding decision-making, can come to be adequate for purposes that are defined by both their guiding research questions and their larger social context of application.

Type
Symposia Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, Eyal, Vincent, Gina M., Harenski, Carla L., Calhoun, Vince D., Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Kiehl, Kent A.. 2013. “Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (15):6223–28. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219302110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkman, Elliot T., and Falk, Emily B.. 2013. “Beyond Brain Mapping: Using Neural Measures to Predict Real-World Outcomes.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (1):4550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bzdok, Danilo, and Ioannidis, John P.A.. 2019. “Exploration, Inference, and Prediction in Neuroscience and Biomedicine.” Trends in Neurosciences 42 (4):251–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bzdok, Danilo, and Thomas Yeo, B.T.. 2017. “Inference in the Age of Big Data: Future Perspectives on Neuroscience.” NeuroImage 155 (July):549–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chirimuuta, Mazviita. 2021. “Prediction Versus Understanding in Computationally Enhanced Neuroscience.” Synthese 199:767–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02713-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2009. “Reintroducing Prediction to Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 76 (4):444–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/648111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather, and Magnus, P.D.. 2013. “State of the Field: Why Novel Prediction Matters.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):580–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Emily B., Berkman, Elliot T., and Lieberman, Matthew D.. 2012. “From Neural Responses to Population Behavior: Neural Focus Group Predicts Population-Level Media Effects.” Psychological Science 23 (5):439–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabrieli, John D. E., Ghosh, Satrajit S., and Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan. 2015. “Prediction as a Humanitarian and Pragmatic Contribution from Human Cognitive Neuroscience.” Neuron 85 (1):1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genevsky, Alexander, Yoon, Carolyn, and Knutson, Brian. 2017. “When Brain Beats Behavior: Neuroforecasting Crowdfunding Outcomes.” The Journal of Neuroscience 37 (36):8625–34. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-16.2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grueso, Sergio, and Viejo-Sobera, Raquel. 2021. “Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia: A Systematic Review.” Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy 13 (1):162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00900-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakim, Adam, and Levy, Dino J.. 2019. “A Gateway to Consumers’ Minds: Achievements, Caveats, and Prospects of Electroencephalography-Based Prediction in Neuromarketing.” WIREs Cognitive Science 10 (2):e1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofman, Jake M., Sharma, Amit, and Watts, Duncan J.. 2017. “Prediction and Explanation in Social Systems.” Science 355 (6324):486–88. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jollans, Lee, and Whelan, Robert. 2018. “Neuromarkers for Mental Disorders: Harnessing Population Neuroscience.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (June):242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, Natalie M., Hunter, Stuart A., and Lawrie, Stephen M.. 2020. “The Benefit of Foresight? An Ethical Evaluation of Predictive Testing for Psychosis in Clinical Practice.” NeuroImage: Clinical 26:102228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northcott, Robert. 2017. “When Are Purely Predictive Models Best?Disputatio 9 (47): 631–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2000. “Why Predict? Historical Perspectives on Prediction in Earth Science.” In Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature, edited by Sarewitz, Daniel, Pielke, Roger Jr, and Byerly, Radford Jr, 2340. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2009. “Confirmation and Adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):233–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00180.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrone, Paula M., Adrià Casamitjana, Carles Falcon, Miquel Artigues, Grégory Operto, Raffaele Cacciaglia, José Luis Molinuevo, Vilaplana, Verónica, Domingo Gispert, Juan, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. 2019. “Prediction of Amyloid Pathology in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals Using Voxel-Wise Analysis of Longitudinal Structural Brain MRI.” Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy 11 (1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0526-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poldrack, Russell A., John Monahan, Peter B. Imrey, Valerie Reyna, Raichle, Marcus E., Faigman, David, and Buckholtz, Joshua W.. 2018. “Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22 (2):111–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarewitz, Daniel, and Pielke, Roger. 1999. “Prediction in Science and Policy.” Technology in Society 21 (2):121–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(99)00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, Christin, Baek, Elisa C., Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Hyun Suk Kim, Cappella, Joseph N., and Falk, Emily B.. 2017. “A Neural Model of Valuation and Information Virality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (11):2881–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615259114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, Charles. 2019. “Neuroscience-Inspired Design: From Academic Neuromarketing to Commercially Relevant Research.” Organizational Research Methods 22 (1):275–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116672003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varoquaux, Gaël, and Poldrack, Russell A.. 2019. “Predictive Models Avoid Excessive Reductionism in Cognitive Neuroimaging.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 55 (April):16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.11.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whelan, Robert, Richard Watts, Catherine A. Orr, Robert R. Althoff, the IMAGEN Consortium, Eric Artiges, Banaschewski, Tobias, et al. 2014. “Neuropsychosocial Profiles of Current and Future Adolescent Alcohol Misusers.Nature 512 (7513):185–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, Choong-Wan, Chang, Luke J., Lindquist, Martin A., and Wager, Tor D.. 2017. “Building Better Biomarkers: Brain Models in Translational Neuroimaging.” Nature Neuroscience 20 (3):365–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarkoni, Tal, and Westfall, Jacob. 2017. “Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (6):1100–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed