Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:14:35.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Point of Departure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

James B. Klee*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Extract

In a recent paper, Maslow (12) has suggested that we turn from means-centering to problem-centering in science. In two other papers (6, 7) the present author offered a theoretical foundation which would make Maslow's suggestions psychologically (empirically) sound. For as he suggests, it is only by centering ourselves towards the task that the task is accomplished or towards the problem that the problem is solved. This does not mean that methods or means, or, in the broader sense, of means as ends or of ends per se, do not constitute problems. The whole problem of psychology is the means by which the organism obtains knowledge; the problem of education is that of means (the teaching), or the problem of communication is one of means (the language), or of any profession, e.g., engineering or medicine, the problem may be of means as a problem. Whichever is the case it is only so far as problems are solved that we are free to go on to tackle new ones or throw light on the more basic ones and thus enrich our lives. Problem solving, of course, does not mean that particular problems as framed are solvable. For example, if the rules state that one must connect each dot with every other dot on a piece of paper (a two dimensional limitation) with lines (straight or curved) that do not intersect, a four dot problem is solvable but a five dot situation cannot be resolved within these rules. In the latter case it may mean that the problem becomes: “can anyone solve it?” This has been the lesson of the mathematicians and the logical positivists. But what is problem solving?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934.Google Scholar
2. Berrien, F. K. A new type of elementary course. The Amer. Psychol., 1947, 2, 148150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Carnap, Rudolf. The two concepts of probability. Philos. Phenomen. Res., 1945, 5, 513532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kardiner, Abram. The individual and his society. New York: Columbia University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
5. Kardiner, Abram. The psychological frontiers of society. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Klee, James B. Learning—acquisition or selection—possibility versus probability. Philos. Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
7. Klee, James B. Conflict, frustration and abnormal behavior. A re-evaluation of the law of effect and the nature of drive and stimulation. (In preparation)Google Scholar
8. Lewis, Helen B. An experimental study of the role of the ego in work. I. The role of the ego in cooperative work. J. exp. Psychol., 1944, 34, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lewis, H. B., and Franklin, M. An experimental study of the role of the ego in work. II. The significance of task-orientation in work. J. Exp. Psychol., 1944, 34, 195215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Maier, N. R. F., and Reninger, H. W. A psychological approach to literary criticism, New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1933.Google Scholar
11. Malinowski, Bronislaw. A scientific theory of culture. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1944.Google Scholar
12. Maslow, A. H. Problem-centering vs. means-centering in science. Philos. Sci., 1946, 13, 326331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Rogers, C. R. Counseling and psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1942.Google Scholar
14. Schlick, Moritz. Problems of ethics. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1939.Google Scholar
15. Toynbee, Arnold J. A study of history. Abridgement of volumes I–VI by D. C. Somervell. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar